Hirose Ryohei, Yoshida Takuma, Naito Yuji, Watanabe Naoto, Hashimoto Hikaru, Sugino Satoshi, Bandou Risa, Daidoji Tomo, Inoue Ken, Dohi Osamu, Yoshida Naohisa, Nakaya Takaaki, Itoh Yoshito
Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85118-4.
In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs.
在日本,目前有两种基于0.4%透明质酸钠(HA)的黏膜下注射材料(SIMs)用于内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD):MucoUp(HA-Mc)和Ksmart(HA-Ks)。HA-Mc和HA-Ks浓度相同,因此大多数内镜医师认为它们没有差异。然而,视觉观察给人的印象是HA-Ks的粘度高于HA-Mc,这表明HA-Ks的性能优于HA-Mc。本研究旨在探讨HA-Mc和HA-Ks之间的差异。与HA-Mc相比,HA-Ks由于重均分子量更大而表现出更高的粘度。HA-Ks的黏膜下隆起高度(SEH)明显高于HA-Mc;HA-Ks-80%(HA-Ks的80%稀释液)的SEH与HA-Mc相同。使用HA-Ks时ESD手术时间明显短于使用HA-Mc(15.2±4.1对19.5±5.9;P=0.049)。HA-Ks的总注射量明显低于HA-Mc(10.8±3.6对14.4±4.6;P=0.045)。然而,HA-Mc和HA-Ks-80%在这些项目上没有观察到显著差异。HA-Mc和HA-Ks被认为几乎相同。尽管如此,HA-Ks的粘度和SIM性能高于HA-Mc。HA-Ks-80%的性能与HA-Mc几乎相同。因此,了解SIM的性能和特性需要关注SIM的粘度。