Crawford Megan R, Chirinos Diana A, Iurcotta Toni, Edinger Jack D, Wyatt James K, Manber Rachel, Ong Jason C
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Jul 15;13(7):911-921. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6666.
This study examined empirically derived symptom cluster profiles among patients who present with insomnia using clinical data and polysomnography.
Latent profile analysis was used to identify symptom cluster profiles of 175 individuals (63% female) with insomnia disorder based on total scores on validated self-report instruments of daytime and nighttime symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index, Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale), mean values from a 7-day sleep diary (sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency), and total sleep time derived from an in-laboratory PSG.
The best-fitting model had three symptom cluster profiles: "High Subjective Wakefulness" (HSW), "Mild Insomnia" (MI) and "Insomnia-Related Distress" (IRD). The HSW symptom cluster profile (26.3% of the sample) reported high wake after sleep onset, high sleep onset latency, and low sleep efficiency. Despite relatively comparable PSG-derived total sleep time, they reported greater levels of daytime sleepiness. The MI symptom cluster profile (45.1%) reported the least disturbance in the sleep diary and questionnaires and had the highest sleep efficiency. The IRD symptom cluster profile (28.6%) reported the highest mean scores on the insomnia-related distress measures (eg, sleep effort and arousal) and waking correlates (fatigue). Covariates associated with symptom cluster membership were older age for the HSW profile, greater obstructive sleep apnea severity for the MI profile, and, when adjusting for obstructive sleep apnea severity, being overweight/obese for the IRD profile.
The heterogeneous nature of insomnia disorder is captured by this data-driven approach to identify symptom cluster profiles. The adaptation of a symptom cluster-based approach could guide tailored patient-centered management of patients presenting with insomnia, and enhance patient care.
本研究利用临床数据和多导睡眠图,对失眠患者经实证得出的症状群特征进行了研究。
基于日间和夜间症状的有效自评工具(失眠严重程度指数、格拉斯哥睡眠努力量表、疲劳严重程度量表、睡眠信念与态度量表、爱泼华嗜睡量表、睡前觉醒量表)的总分、7天睡眠日记的平均值(入睡潜伏期、睡眠中觉醒时间和睡眠效率)以及实验室多导睡眠图得出的总睡眠时间,采用潜在类别分析来确定175名失眠症患者(63%为女性)的症状群特征。
拟合度最佳的模型有三种症状群特征:“高度主观觉醒”(HSW)、“轻度失眠”(MI)和“失眠相关困扰”(IRD)。HSW症状群特征组(占样本的26.3%)报告睡眠中觉醒时间长、入睡潜伏期长且睡眠效率低。尽管多导睡眠图得出的总睡眠时间相对相当,但他们报告的日间嗜睡程度更高。MI症状群特征组(45.1%)在睡眠日记和问卷中报告的干扰最少,睡眠效率最高。IRD症状群特征组(28.6%)在失眠相关困扰测量指标(如睡眠努力和觉醒)以及觉醒相关指标(疲劳)上的平均得分最高。与症状群类别相关的协变量为:HSW特征组为年龄较大,MI特征组为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度较高,在调整阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度后,IRD特征组为超重/肥胖。
这种数据驱动的方法识别症状群特征,体现了失眠症的异质性。采用基于症状群的方法可为失眠患者提供以患者为中心的个性化管理指导,并改善患者护理。