• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

班级关系质量与瑞典校园欺凌中防御和被动旁观的社会认知相关性:多层次分析。

Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis.

机构信息

Linköping University, Sweden.

Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002
PMID:28633938
Abstract

Using the social-ecological and social cognitive theories as integrated guiding frameworks, the present study examined whether moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy at the individual level, and moral disengagement, quality of teacher-student relationships and quality of student-student relationships at the classroom level were associated with passive bystanding and defending in bullying situations. Participants were 900 Swedish students from 43 classrooms, ranging in age from 9 to 13years. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that passive reactions by bystanders were associated with greater moral disengagement and less defender self-efficacy. Defending, in turn, was associated with less moral disengagement and greater defender self-efficacy and classroom student-student relationship quality. Furthermore, students who scored high in moral disengagement were even less prone to defend victims when the classroom student-student relationship quality was low, but more prone to act as defenders when the classroom student-student relationship quality was high. In addition, the negative association between defender self-efficacy and passive bystanding was stronger both in classrooms with higher student-student relationship quality and in those with lower class moral disengagement. Implications for prevention are discussed.

摘要

本研究采用社会生态学和社会认知理论作为综合指导框架,考察了个体层面的道德去责任化和防御者自我效能感,以及课堂层面的道德去责任化、师生关系质量和生生关系质量是否与欺凌情境中的被动旁观和防御行为有关。参与者是来自 43 个班级的 900 名瑞典学生,年龄在 9 至 13 岁之间。多层次回归分析显示,旁观者的消极反应与更高的道德去责任化和更低的防御者自我效能感有关。防御行为则与更少的道德去责任化和更高的防御者自我效能感以及更好的课堂生生关系质量有关。此外,当课堂生生关系质量较低时,道德去责任化程度较高的学生不太可能为受害者辩护,但当课堂生生关系质量较高时,他们更有可能成为辩护者。此外,防御者自我效能感与被动旁观之间的负相关关系在生生关系质量较高的班级和道德去责任化程度较低的班级中更强。讨论了预防的影响。

相似文献

1
Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis.班级关系质量与瑞典校园欺凌中防御和被动旁观的社会认知相关性:多层次分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: a multilevel analysis.个体和集体道德脱离在同伴攻击及旁观者行为中的作用:一项多层次分析
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(3):441-52. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9920-7.
3
Defending or Remaining Passive as a Bystander of School Bullying in Sweden: The Role of Moral Disengagement and Antibullying Class Norms.瑞典校园欺凌旁观者的辩护行为或消极不作为:道德推脱及反欺凌班级规范的作用
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP18666-NP18689. doi: 10.1177/08862605211037427. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
Longitudinal associations of social-cognitive and moral correlates with defending in bullying.社会认知和道德关联与欺凌行为中防卫行为的纵向关联
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Apr;91:146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth.元分析青少年道德脱离与欺凌角色之间的关系。
Aggress Behav. 2019 Jul;45(4):450-462. doi: 10.1002/ab.21833. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Individual Moral Disengagement and Bullying Among Swedish Fifth Graders: The Role of Collective Moral Disengagement and Pro-Bullying Behavior Within Classrooms.个体道德脱离与瑞典五年级学生中的欺凌行为:集体道德脱离和课堂内支持欺凌行为的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):NP9576-NP9600. doi: 10.1177/0886260519860889. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
7
Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.旁观者在欺凌情境中的行为:基本道德敏感性、道德脱离和保护者自我效能感。
J Adolesc. 2013 Jun;36(3):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
Early adolescents' motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student-teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach.青少年早期在校园欺凌中为受害者辩护的动机及其对师生关系的认知:一种自我决定理论视角
J Adolesc. 2016 Dec;53:75-90. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
9
Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents' Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations.捍卫、旁观还是参与?:道德认同、道德判断和社会自我效能感对青少年在欺凌情境中旁观者行为的相对影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Oct;48(10):2051-2064. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01089-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying.自我报告和同伴提名的校园欺凌中的道德脱离。
Aggress Behav. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):133-44. doi: 10.1002/ab.20378. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
When motivation isn't enough: perceived teacher attitudes, efficacy, and efforts moderate student responses to bullying.当动机不足时:教师的感知态度、效能感和努力程度会调节学生对欺凌行为的反应。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;13(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02959-8.
2
Relationship between cumulative peer risk and sense of security among adolescents: a moderated mediation model.青少年累积同伴风险与安全感之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 31;13(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02891-x.
3
The relationship between defending self-efficacy and defending behavior in cyberbullying: a moderated mediation model.
网络欺凌中自我防御效能感与防御行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;13(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02758-1.
4
Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy as predictors of students' self-reported bystander behaviors over a school year: a growth curve analysis.基本道德敏感性、道德脱离和捍卫者自我效能作为学生在一学年内自我报告的旁观者行为的预测因素:一项增长曲线分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1378755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378755. eCollection 2024.
5
Can Virtual Reality be Used for the Prevention of Peer Sexual Harassment in Adolescence? First Evaluation of the Virtual-PRO Program.虚拟现实能否用于预防青少年同伴性骚扰?虚拟-PRO 项目的初步评估。
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):29-42. doi: 10.5093/pi2024a1. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Inclusive classroom climate development as the cornerstone of inclusive school building: review and perspectives.营造包容性课堂氛围作为全纳学校建设的基石:综述与展望
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 1;14:1171204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171204. eCollection 2023.
7
What roles matter? An explorative study on bullying and cyberbullying by using the eye-tracker.哪些角色重要?一项使用眼动仪对欺凌和网络欺凌的探索性研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Jun;95(2):249-269. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12604. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
Defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement on social support and bystander behaviors among primary school students: a multilevel moderated mediation model.小学生的防御性自我效能感和道德脱离对社会支持及旁观者行为的影响:一个多层次有调节的中介模型
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Apr 28;36(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00253-3.
9
Dublin Anti-Bullying Self-Efficacy Scales: Bifactor and Item Response Theory Models.都柏林反欺凌自我效能感量表:双因子和项目反应理论模型。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8721-8749. doi: 10.1177/08862605231155137. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Dublin Anti-Bullying Self-Efficacy Models and Scales: Development and Validation.都柏林反欺凌自我效能模型与量表:编制与验证。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Apr;38(7-8):5748-5773. doi: 10.1177/08862605221127193. Epub 2022 Sep 30.