• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别和年龄对基于人群的注册研究中心律失常的影响。

The influence of sex and age on ventricular arrhythmia in a population-based registry.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, QE, II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada.

Research Methods Unit, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.041
PMID:28634036
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and population-based studies have shown no difference in mortality between men and women, but often show that men are more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy. We utilized a population-based registry to investigate the interaction of sex and age and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in an ICD population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 776 consecutive patients receiving an ICD for primary or secondary prevention in a provincial ICD registry were studied. No significant mortality difference was found between men and women (27.5% versus 23.7%, p=0.39). Overall, men were more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy compared to women (39.3% versus 26.7%, p=0.006). The hazard ratio for appropriate therapy in men vs. women <60years of age was 3.22, CI 95% (1.56-6.65), p=0.002, and the same comparison in men vs. women over the age of 60 showed no significant difference (HR 1.11, CI 95% [0.74-1.65], p=0.61). This interaction between age and sex remained significant when adjusted for New York Heart Associated Class, ejection fraction, coronary artery disease and indication for ICD (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the risk of appropriate ICD therapy increases as women are older, reaching similar risk as men in that age group. Further study of the mechanism of the interaction of age and sex as they modulate the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia may be warranted.

摘要

背景

临床试验和基于人群的研究的事后分析表明,男性和女性的死亡率没有差异,但通常表明男性更有可能接受适当的 ICD 治疗。我们利用基于人群的登记处调查了 ICD 人群中心律失常发生的性别和年龄的相互作用。

方法和结果

共研究了省级 ICD 登记处中因原发性或继发性预防而接受 ICD 的 776 例连续患者。男性和女性之间未发现死亡率有显著差异(27.5%比 23.7%,p=0.39)。总体而言,男性比女性更有可能接受适当的 ICD 治疗(39.3%比 26.7%,p=0.006)。<60 岁的男性与女性相比,适当治疗的风险比为 3.22,95%CI(1.56-6.65),p=0.002,而在 60 岁以上的男性与女性相比,没有显著差异(HR 1.11,95%CI [0.74-1.65],p=0.61)。当调整纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、射血分数、冠心病和 ICD 适应证后,这种年龄和性别之间的相互作用仍然显著(p=0.02)。

结论

本研究表明,随着女性年龄的增长,接受适当 ICD 治疗的风险增加,在该年龄组中,女性的风险与男性相似。可能需要进一步研究年龄和性别相互作用作为调节心律失常发生的机制。

相似文献

1
The influence of sex and age on ventricular arrhythmia in a population-based registry.性别和年龄对基于人群的注册研究中心律失常的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Factors predisposing to ventricular tachyarrhythmia leading to appropriate ICD intervention in patients with coronary artery disease or non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.导致冠心病或非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者 ICD 干预的致室性心律失常的相关因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(12):1264-75.
3
Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation early after defibrillator implantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is explained by a high-risk subgroup of patients.肥厚型心肌病患者植入除颤器后早期出现室性心动过速/颤动可由高危亚组患者解释。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Feb;10(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
4
Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者长期随访期间适当电击存在性别差异,但死亡率无性别差异。
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1194-202. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv361. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
5
Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in a nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy population: reappraisal of the role of programmed ventricular stimulation.非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的心脏性猝死的一级预防:程序性心室刺激作用的再评估。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;6(3):504-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000216. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
6
Clinical effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in men and women with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF.心力衰竭男性和女性心脏再同步和植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的临床效果:来自 IMPROVE HF 的研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):146-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000789. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Appropriate Therapy, Outcomes, and Complications.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗致心律失常性右室发育不良/心肌病:恰当治疗的预测因素、结局及并发症
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):e006242. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006242.
8
Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outcomes: findings from a prospective defibrillator database.性别对植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗效果的影响:来自前瞻性除颤器数据库的发现。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):195-203. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00007.
9
The gender-paradox among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a propensity-matched study.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的性别悖论:一项倾向匹配研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):878-84. doi: 10.1111/pace.12141. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
10
Determinants of patient survival rate after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator without resynchronisation capability.无再同步功能的心脏除颤器植入后患者生存率的决定因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1099-110.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.植入式心脏复律除颤器用于心脏性猝死二级预防患者的预后性别差异
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 5;11(4):116. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040116.
2
Sex-specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.性别对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者室性心律失常结局和危险分层的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3726-3736. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13444. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations.
体位性刺激引起的心率反应的性别差异。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;297:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044. Epub 2019 Oct 7.