von Below Catrin, Wassberg Cecilia, Norberg Mona, Tolf Anna, Kullberg Joel, Ladjevardi Sam, Häggman Michael, Bill Axelson Anna, Ahlström Håkan
a Department of Surgical Sciences/Radiology , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
b Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Scand J Urol. 2017 Apr;51(2):107-113. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1281346. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional value of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (SB) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). An additional aim was to compare the biopsy results to MRI evaluation using a Likert scale.
Patients with newly diagnosed localized PCa (n = 53) by clinical routine SB were prospectively included. The majority of the patients were scheduled for curative therapy before enrollment. The patients underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) at 3 T using an endorectal coil followed by two MRI-TBs, using ultrasound with cognitive fusion. All included patients underwent MRI-TB, even those who had low to very low suspicion of significant PCa on mpMRI. The detection rate of significant cancer on SB versus SB + MRI-TB was compared in the 53 included patients and with whole-mounted histopathology as reference in 34 cases. Comparison of the biopsy results to MRI evaluation and interreader agreement calculation of five-point Likert score evaluation were performed.
In total, 32 significant (Gleason ≥7) PCa were detected by SB, while SB + MRI-TB detected an additional five significant PCa. MRI-TB alone detected 20 and missed 17 significant PCa. Ten of the significant PCa cases missed by MRI-TB had a Likert score of 3 or lower. Interreader agreement using the Likert scale was high, with a kappa value of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.92, p < 0.0001).
Detection of significant PCa increased by adding MRI-TB to SB. This may not be of enough clinical value to justify the use of targeted biopsies in this patient group.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像靶向活检(MRI-TB)相较于标准经直肠超声引导活检(SB)在检测临床显著性前列腺癌(PCa)方面的附加价值。另一目的是使用李克特量表将活检结果与MRI评估进行比较。
前瞻性纳入经临床常规SB新诊断为局限性PCa(n = 53)的患者。大多数患者在入组前计划接受根治性治疗。患者使用直肠内线圈在3T下行多参数MRI(mpMRI)检查,随后进行两次MRI-TB,采用超声与认知融合技术。所有纳入患者均接受MRI-TB,即使是那些在mpMRI上对显著性PCa怀疑程度低至极低的患者。在53例纳入患者中比较SB与SB + MRI-TB对显著性癌症的检出率,并以34例患者的全层组织病理学检查结果作为参考。将活检结果与MRI评估进行比较,并计算五点李克特评分评估的阅片者间一致性。
SB共检测出32例显著性(Gleason≥7)PCa,而SB + MRI-TB又额外检测出5例显著性PCa。单独MRI-TB检测出20例显著性PCa,漏检17例。MRI-TB漏检的10例显著性PCa病例的李克特评分为3分或更低。使用李克特量表的阅片者间一致性较高,kappa值为0.77(95%置信区间0.63 - 0.92,p<0.0001)。
在SB基础上增加MRI-TB可提高显著性PCa的检出率。但在该患者群体中,这可能没有足够的临床价值来证明使用靶向活检的合理性。