• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[免接触胰腺切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:一项系统评价]

[No-touch pancreatectomy and radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a systematic review].

作者信息

Lyadov V K, Milovanov V V

机构信息

Treatment and Rehabilitation Center of Russian Ministry of Health Care; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016(12):93-97. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20161293-97.

DOI:10.17116/hirurgia20161293-97
PMID:28635776
Abstract

AIM

To summarize the data of 'no-touch isolation technique' (NIT) for pancreatoduodenectomy and radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We looked through Pubmed and Cochrane databases for scientific papers published from January 2000 until September 2014.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. There were 7 retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Mean operation time and blood loss were 267 min (198-386 min) and 132 ml (331-744 ml) respectively. Mean morbidity rate was 35% (17-58%). There was no 30-day mortality. Mean incidence of R0-resection varied from 50% to 97% with average value 84%. Median survival was reported in 3 studies (17, 18 and 26 months). Five-year actuarial overall survival was reported in 4 studies (31, 36, 40 and 53%).

CONCLUSION

Positive results of NIT and RAMPS might justify further evaluation of the method in pancreatic cancer. Prospective randomized controlled trials needs to be done to demonstrate the oncological value of this novel surgical technique.

摘要

目的

总结胰十二指肠切除术的“非接触隔离技术”(NIT)以及胰腺恶性肿瘤根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)的数据。

材料与方法

我们查阅了Pubmed和Cochrane数据库,以获取2000年1月至2014年9月发表的科学论文。

结果

纳入八项研究。其中有七项回顾性队列研究和一项随机对照试验(RCT)。平均手术时间和失血量分别为267分钟(198 - 386分钟)和132毫升(33 - 744毫升)。平均发病率为35%(17 - 58%)。无30天死亡率。R0切除的平均发生率在50%至97%之间,平均值为84%。三项研究报告了中位生存期(17、18和26个月)。四项研究报告了五年精算总生存率(31%、36%、40%和53%)。

结论

NIT和RAMPS的阳性结果可能证明有必要对该方法在胰腺癌中的应用进行进一步评估。需要开展前瞻性随机对照试验来证明这种新型手术技术的肿瘤学价值。

相似文献

1
[No-touch pancreatectomy and radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a systematic review].[免接触胰腺切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:一项系统评价]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016(12):93-97. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20161293-97.
2
Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04250-0.
3
Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.顺行性模块化胰脾切除术和远端胰腺切除术相关的术后长期生存质量及并发症评估:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
BMC Surg. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0476-x.
4
Left-sided pancreatic cancer: distal pancreatectomy and its variants: radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection.左侧胰腺癌:胰体尾切除术及其变体:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术和伴有腹腔动脉切除的胰体尾切除术。
Cancer J. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):562-70. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31827596c5.
5
Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与胰腺癌的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):46-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5675-4. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma.标准逆行胰脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1154-8.
7
[Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail].根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与传统远端胰腺切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 1;58(7):505-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200413-00301.
8
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.经屈氏韧带入路腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4836-4837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5561-6. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
10
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术(CDPS)治疗左侧胰导管腺癌的比较。
Surg Today. 2021 Jul;51(7):1126-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
An Orthotopic Resection Surgical Technique Using an Inferior Infracolic Approach for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.一种采用结肠下下途径的原位切除手术技术用于腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 11;12(2):590. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020590.