School of Molecular Sciences and The Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Analyst. 2017 Jul 24;142(15):2748-2759. doi: 10.1039/c7an00396j.
Glycan permethylation was introduced as a tool to facilitate the study of glycans in 1903. Since that time, permethylation procedures have been continually modified to improve permethylation efficiency and qualitative applicability. Typically, however, either laborious preparation steps or cumbersome and uneconomical spin columns have been needed to obtain decent permethylation yields on small glycan samples. Here we describe a spin column-free (SCF) glycan permethylation procedure that is applicable to both O- and N-linked glycans and can be employed upstream to intact glycan analysis by MALDI-MS, ESI-MS, or glycan linkage analysis by GC-MS. The SCF procedure involves neutralization of NaOH beads by acidified phosphate buffer, which eliminates the risk of glycan oxidative degradation and avoids the use of spin columns. Optimization of the new permethylation procedure provided high permethylation efficiency for both hexose (>98%) and HexNAc (>99%) residues-yields which were comparable to (or better than) those of some widely-used spin column-based procedures. A light vs. heavy labelling approach was employed to compare intact glycan yields from a popular spin-column based approach to the SCF approach. Recovery of intact N-glycans was significantly better with the SCF procedure (p < 0.05), but overall yield of O-glycans was similar or slightly diminished (p < 0.05 for tetrasaccharides or smaller). When the SCF procedure was employed upstream to hydrolysis, reduction and acetylation for glycan linkage analysis of pooled glycans from unfractionated blood plasma, analytical reproducibility was on par with that from previous spin column-based "glycan node" analysis results. When applied to blood plasma samples from stage III-IV breast cancer patients (n = 20) and age-matched controls (n = 20), the SCF procedure facilitated identification of three glycan nodes with significantly different distributions between the cases and controls (ROC c-statistics > 0.75; p < 0.01). In summary, the SCF permethylation procedure expedites and economizes both intact glycan analysis and linkage analysis of glycans from whole biospecimens.
聚糖全甲基化于 1903 年被引入,作为一种研究聚糖的工具。自那时以来,全甲基化程序不断改进,以提高全甲基化效率和定性适用性。然而,通常需要繁琐的准备步骤或繁琐且不经济的螺旋柱来获得小聚糖样品的可观全甲基化产率。在这里,我们描述了一种无螺旋柱(SCF)聚糖全甲基化程序,该程序适用于 O-和 N-连接的聚糖,并且可以在上游用于 MALDI-MS、ESI-MS 或 GC-MS 的完整聚糖分析之前进行。SCF 程序涉及用酸化的磷酸盐缓冲液中和 NaOH 珠,这消除了聚糖氧化降解的风险,并避免了使用螺旋柱。新全甲基化程序的优化为己糖(>98%)和 HexNAc(>99%)残基提供了高全甲基化效率-与一些广泛使用的基于螺旋柱的程序相比,这些效率相当或更好。采用轻标记与重标记的方法比较了基于流行的螺旋柱方法和 SCF 方法的完整聚糖产率。SCF 程序回收完整的 N-聚糖的效果明显更好(p < 0.05),但 O-聚糖的总体产率相似或略有降低(对于四糖或更小的产率,p < 0.05)。当 SCF 程序在上游用于水解、还原和乙酰化,以分析未经分离的血浆中混合聚糖的糖链连接时,分析重现性与之前基于螺旋柱的“聚糖节点”分析结果相当。当应用于 III-IV 期乳腺癌患者(n = 20)和年龄匹配的对照者(n = 20)的血浆样本时,SCF 程序有助于鉴定三个糖链节点,这些节点在病例和对照者之间的分布有显著差异(ROC c 统计量>0.75;p<0.01)。总之,SCF 全甲基化程序加快了整个生物样本中完整聚糖分析和聚糖连接分析的速度,并节省了成本。