Reynolds Shannon L, Ghate Sameer R, Sheer Richard, Gandhi Pranav K, Moretz Chad, Wang Cheng, Sander Stephen, Costantino Mary E, Annavarapu Srinivas, Andrews George
Comprehensive Health Insights, 315 W Market St., 7th Floor, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jun 21;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0705-x.
Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) such as dabigatran, when compared to warfarin, have been shown to potentially reduce the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) together with lower healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and similar total costs. This study expands on previous work by comparing HCRU and costs for patients newly diagnosed with NVAF and newly initiated on dabigatran or warfarin, and is the first study specifically in a Medicare population.
A retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted using data from administrative health care claims during the study period 01/01/2010-12/31/2012. Cox regression analyses were used to compare all-cause risk of first hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits. Medical, pharmacy, and total costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were compared between dabigatran and warfarin users.
A total of 1110 patients initiated on dabigatran were propensity score-matched with corresponding patients initiated on warfarin. The mean number of hospitalizations (0.92 vs. 1.13, P = 0.012), ER visits (1.32 vs. 1.56, P < 0.01), office visits (21.43 vs. 29.41; P < 0.01), and outpatient visits (10.86 vs. 22.02; P < 0.01) were lower among dabigatran compared to warfarin users. Patients initiated on dabigatran had significantly lower risk of first all-cause ER visits [hazard ratio (HR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.98] compared to those initiated on warfarin. Adjusted mean pharmacy costs PPPM were significantly greater for dabigatran users ($510 vs. $250, P < 0.001); however, mean medical costs PPPM ($1912 vs. $1956, P = 0.55) and mean total costs PPPM ($2381 vs. $2183, P = 0.10) were not significantly different compared to warfarin users.
Dabigatran users had significantly lower HCRU compared to warfarin users. In addition, dabigatran users had lower risk of all-cause ER visits. Despite higher pharmacy costs, the two cohorts did not differ significantly in medical or total all-cause costs.
与华法林相比,新型口服抗凝剂(如达比加群)已被证明在降低非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中风风险方面具有潜在优势,同时医疗资源利用率(HCRU)较低且总成本相近。本研究通过比较新诊断为NVAF并新开始使用达比加群或华法林的患者的HCRU和成本,对先前的研究进行了拓展,并且是第一项专门针对医疗保险人群的研究。
利用2010年1月1日至2012年12月31日研究期间行政医疗保健索赔数据进行回顾性匹配队列研究。使用Cox回归分析比较首次住院和急诊室(ER)就诊的全因风险。比较达比加群和华法林使用者的医疗、药房和每位患者每月(PPPM)总成本。
共有1110名开始使用达比加群的患者与相应的开始使用华法林的患者进行倾向评分匹配。与华法林使用者相比,达比加群使用者的平均住院次数(0.92对1.13,P = 0.012)、急诊就诊次数(1.32对1.56,P < 0.01)、门诊就诊次数(21.43对29.41;P < 0.01)和门诊就诊次数(10.86对22.02;P < 0.01)较低。与开始使用华法林的患者相比,开始使用达比加群的患者首次全因急诊就诊风险显著降低[风险比(HR):0.84,95%置信区间(CI):0.73 - 0.98]。达比加群使用者调整后的平均药房成本PPPM显著更高(510美元对250美元,P < 0.001);然而,与华法林使用者相比,平均医疗成本PPPM(1912美元对1956美元,P = 0.55)和平均总成本PPPM(2381美元对2183美元,P = 0.10)没有显著差异。
与华法林使用者相比,达比加群使用者的HCRU显著更低。此外,达比加群使用者全因急诊就诊风险更低。尽管药房成本更高,但两组在医疗或全因总成本方面没有显著差异。