Suppr超能文献

达比加群酯和华法林在心房颤动患者常规治疗中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in routine care of patients with atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

John Seeger, PharmD, DrPH, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Tel.: +1 617 278 0335, Fax: +1 617 232 8602, E-mail:

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1277-89. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0497. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Abstract

The RE-LY study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of dabigatran relative to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It is important to further evaluate safety and effectiveness of drugs in routine care. This study used a sequential cohort design with propensity score matching to compare dabigatran with warfarin among patients in two commercial health insurance databases. New users of these anticoagulants were followed from initiation until discontinuation, the end of the study, or the occurrence of a study outcome (primary study outcomes were stroke and major bleeding). Proportional hazards regression was conducted separately within each data source and results were pooled. Among 19,189 matched dabigatran and warfarin initiators (mean age: 68 years, 36 % female), as-treated follow-up (average of 5 months for dabigatran, 4 months for warfarin) identified 62 and 69 strokes, respectively (pooled HR = 0.77; 95 % CI = 0.54 to 1.09), and 354 and 395 major haemorrhages, respectively (HR = 0.75; 0.65 to 0.87). No meaningful heterogeneity was identified across subgroups, but numeric trends suggest more pronounced stroke prevention by dabigatran relative to warfarin among patients age 75+ (HR = 0.57; 0.33 to 0.97) or with < 6 months of use (HR = 0.51; 0.19 to 1.42). Major bleeds were reduced more by dabigatran among patients aged < 55 (HR = 0.51; 0.30 to 0.87) and with CHADS2 < 2 (HR = 0.58; 0.44 to 0.77). In conclusion, in routine care of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, dabigatran treatment resulted in improved health outcomes compared with warfarin.

摘要

RE-LY 研究表明,达比加群酯相对于华法林在预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的中风方面是安全有效的。评估常规治疗中药物的安全性和有效性非常重要。本研究采用序贯队列设计和倾向评分匹配,比较了两种商业健康保险数据库中达比加群酯和华法林的患者。这些抗凝药物的新使用者从开始治疗到停药、研究结束或出现研究结果(主要研究结果为中风和大出血)进行随访。分别在每个数据源中进行比例风险回归,并对结果进行汇总。在 19189 名匹配的达比加群酯和华法林使用者中(平均年龄:68 岁,36%为女性),实际治疗随访(达比加群酯平均为 5 个月,华法林为 4 个月)分别确定了 62 例和 69 例中风(汇总 HR=0.77;95%CI=0.54 至 1.09),分别为 354 例和 395 例大出血(HR=0.75;0.65 至 0.87)。亚组间未发现有意义的异质性,但数值趋势表明,达比加群酯在年龄 75 岁以上(HR=0.57;0.33 至 0.97)或使用时间<6 个月(HR=0.51;0.19 至 1.42)的患者中,中风预防效果更为显著。达比加群酯在年龄<55 岁(HR=0.51;0.30 至 0.87)和 CHADS2<2(HR=0.58;0.44 至 0.77)的患者中,大出血减少更为明显。总之,在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的常规治疗中,与华法林相比,达比加群酯治疗可改善健康结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验