Mistral Thomas, Boué Yvonnick, Bosson Jean-Luc, Manhes Pauline, Greze Jules, Brun Julien, Albaladejo Pierre, Payen Jean-François, Bouzat Pierre
Grenoble Alpes Trauma Center, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
University Grenoble Alpes, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 21;25(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0404-y.
Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is a common feature after severe trauma. Detection of TIC is based upon classic coagulation tests including international normalized ratio (INR) value. Point-of-care (POC) devices have been developed to rapidly measure INR at the bedside on whole blood. The aim of the study was to test the precision of the Coagucheck® XS Pro device for INR measurement at hospital admission after severe trauma.
We conducted a prospective observational study in a French level I trauma center. From January 2015 to May 2016, 98 patients with a suspicion of a post-traumatic acute hemorrhage had POC-INR measurement on whole blood concomitantly to classic laboratory INR determination (lab-INR) on plasma at hospital admission. The agreement between the two methods in sorting three predefined categories of INR (normal coagulation, moderate TIC and severe TIC) was evaluated using the Cohen's kappa test with a quadratic weighting. The correlation between POC-INR and lab-INR was measured using the Pearson's coefficient. We also performed a Bland and Altman analysis.
The agreement between the lab-INR and the POC-INR was moderate (Kappa = 0.45 [95% CI 0.36-0.50]) and the correlation between the two measurements was also weak (Pearson's coefficient = 0.44 [95% CI 0.27-0.59]). Using a Bland and Altman analysis, the mean difference (bias) for INR was 0.22 [95% CI 0.02-0.42], and the standard deviation (precision) of the difference was 1.01.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: POC Coagucheck® XS Pro device is not reliable to measure bedside INR. Its moderate agreement with lab-INR weakens the usefulness of such device after severe trauma.
NCT02869737 . Registered 9 August 2016.
创伤性凝血病(TIC)是严重创伤后的常见特征。TIC的检测基于包括国际标准化比值(INR)值在内的经典凝血试验。即时检测(POC)设备已被开发用于在床边对全血快速测量INR。本研究的目的是测试Coagucheck® XS Pro设备在严重创伤后入院时测量INR的准确性。
我们在一家法国一级创伤中心进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。2015年1月至2016年5月,98例疑似创伤后急性出血的患者在入院时接受了全血POC-INR测量,同时对血浆进行经典实验室INR测定(实验室INR)。使用二次加权的Cohen's kappa检验评估两种方法在对三种预定义INR类别(正常凝血、中度TIC和重度TIC)进行分类时的一致性。使用Pearson系数测量POC-INR与实验室INR之间的相关性。我们还进行了Bland和Altman分析。
实验室INR与POC-INR之间的一致性为中等(Kappa = 0.45 [95% CI 0.36 - 0.50]),两种测量之间的相关性也较弱(Pearson系数 = 0.44 [95% CI 0.27 - 0.59])。使用Bland和Altman分析,INR的平均差异(偏差)为0.22 [95% CI 0.02 - 0.42],差异的标准差(精密度)为1.01。
讨论/结论:POC Coagucheck® XS Pro设备用于床边测量INR不可靠。其与实验室INR的中等一致性削弱了该设备在严重创伤后的实用性。
NCT02869737。2016年8月9日注册。