Neto Tiago, Freitas Sandro R, Marques Marta, Gomes Luis, Andrade Ricardo, Oliveira Raúl
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, Portugal.
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, Portugal; Benfica LAB, Sport Lisboa e Benfica, Lisboa, Portugal.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Neural mobilization (NM) is widely used to assess and treat several neuromuscular disorders. However, information regarding the NM effects targeting the lower body quadrant is scarce.
To determine the effects of NM techniques targeting the lower body quadrant in healthy and low back pain (LBP) populations.
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Randomized controlled trials were included if any form of NM was applied to the lower body quadrant. Pain, disability, and lower limb flexibility were the main outcomes. PEDro scale was used to assess methodological quality.
Forty-five studies were selected for full-text analysis, and ten were included in the meta-analysis, involving 502 participants. Overall, studies presented fair to good quality, with a mean PEDro score of 6.3 (from 4 to 8). Five studies used healthy participants, and five targeted people with LBP. A moderate effect size (g = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.48-0.98) was determined, favoring the use of NM to increase flexibility in healthy adults. Larger effect sizes were found for the effect of NM in pain reduction (g = 0.82, 95% CI 0.56-1.08) and disability improvement (g = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.14-2.03), in people with LBP.
Evidence suggests that there are positive effects from the application of NM to the lower body quadrant. Specifically, NM shows moderate effects on flexibility in healthy participants, and large effects on pain and disability in people with LBP. Nevertheless, more studies with high methodological quality are necessary to support these conclusions.
神经松动术(NM)被广泛用于评估和治疗多种神经肌肉疾病。然而,关于针对下半身象限的神经松动术效果的信息却很少。
确定针对健康人群和下背痛(LBP)人群下半身象限的神经松动术技术的效果。
系统评价与荟萃分析。
如果将任何形式的神经松动术应用于下半身象限,则纳入随机对照试验。疼痛、功能障碍和下肢柔韧性是主要结局指标。使用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。
45项研究被选作全文分析,10项纳入荟萃分析,涉及502名参与者。总体而言,研究质量为中等至良好,平均PEDro评分为6.3(范围为4至8)。5项研究使用健康参与者,5项针对下背痛患者。确定了中等效应量(g = 0.73,95%CI:0.48 - 0.98),支持使用神经松动术来增加健康成年人的柔韧性。在LBP患者中,神经松动术在减轻疼痛(g = 0.82,95%CI 0.56 - 1.08)和改善功能障碍方面(g = 1.59,95%CI:1.14 - 2.03)发现了更大的效应量。
证据表明,将神经松动术应用于下半身象限有积极效果。具体而言,神经松动术对健康参与者的柔韧性有中等影响,对LBP患者的疼痛和功能障碍有较大影响。然而,需要更多方法学质量高的研究来支持这些结论。