Clement N D, Duckworth A D, Wickramasinghe N R, Court-Brown C M, McQueen M M
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Dec;27(8):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2003-z. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
The aim of this study in adult patients with a distal radial fracture was to determine whether socioeconomic status influenced the epidemiology, mechanism of injury, fracture severity, or the outcome according to function, radiographic assessment, and rate of associated complications.
We identified 3983 distal radial fractures over a 7-year period. Socioeconomic status was assigned using the Carstairs score, and the population was divided into quintiles depending on deprivation. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture severity, and radiographic assessment at time of injury were assessed for epidemiological differences according to social quintile. Functional outcome was assessed using grip strength, Moberg pickup test, return to normal use of the hand, and range of movement. Radiographs were assessed at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year. Complications were defined as malunion, carpal tunnel syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), persistent pain, and subjective cosmetic deformity of the wrist.
Socioeconomically deprived patients were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (p = 0.017); after adjusting for confounding factors, deprived patients were 3.1 (95% CI 1.4-4.7) years younger than the most affluent patients (p < 0.001). Deprived patients were more likely to sustain their fracture by a high-energy mechanism (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between quintiles in outcome. There was a significantly greater prevalence of CRPS in more affluent patients (p = 0.004).
Socioeconomically deprived patients sustaining a distal radial fracture are more likely to be younger and male. Outcome is not influenced by socioeconomic status, but the prevalence of CRPS is greater in more affluent patients.
本研究针对成年桡骨远端骨折患者,旨在确定社会经济地位是否会根据功能、影像学评估及相关并发症发生率,对骨折的流行病学、损伤机制、严重程度或预后产生影响。
我们在7年时间里识别出3983例桡骨远端骨折患者。采用卡斯尔斯评分来确定社会经济地位,并根据贫困程度将人群分为五个五分位数组。根据社会五分位数组评估患者的人口统计学特征、损伤机制、骨折严重程度以及受伤时的影像学评估,以找出流行病学差异。使用握力、莫伯格拾物试验、手部恢复正常使用情况及活动范围来评估功能预后。在伤后1周、6周和1年时对X线片进行评估。并发症定义为骨不连、腕管综合征、复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)、持续疼痛以及腕部主观外观畸形。
社会经济贫困的患者明显更年轻(p < 0.001),且男性比例更高(p = 0.017);在对混杂因素进行调整后,贫困患者比最富裕患者年轻3.1岁(95%可信区间1.4 - 4.7)(p < 0.001)。贫困患者更有可能因高能量机制导致骨折(p = 0.004)。五分位数组之间在预后方面无显著差异。富裕患者中CRPS的患病率明显更高(p = 0.004)。
发生桡骨远端骨折的社会经济贫困患者更可能年轻且为男性。预后不受社会经济地位影响,但富裕患者中CRPS的患病率更高。