Tom J. Crijns BSc, Bonheur A. T. D. van der Gronde BSc, David Ring MD, PhD, Nina Leung PhD, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):744-750. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000070.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is frequently diagnosed in patients recovering from surgery or injury. The symptoms and signs included in consensus diagnostic criteria for CRPS are expected after injury. Categorizing symptoms and signs that occur on a continuum as disproportionate or not is subjective and prone to bias. Psychiatrists and psychologists do not diagnose CRPS and instead measure and treat anxiety and catastrophic thinking on its continuum. Given the expected variation in subjective diagnoses such as CRPS, this study addresses factors associated with use of this diagnosis and how it influences care.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Among patients recovering from fracture of the distal radius, what factors are associated with the diagnosis of CRPS? (2) Are patients diagnosed with CRPS after distal radius fractures, as opposed to those without CRPS, more likely to have a bone scan, stellate ganglion block, therapy, or subsequent surgery?
Using the Truven database, we identified 59,765 patients treated for a distal radius fracture from 2012 to 2014, of whom 114 (0.19%) were diagnosed with CRPS. The Truven Health MarketScan database is an administrative claims data set of commercially insured patients and this analysis only included patients with complete enrollment from 2012 through 2014. Bivariate analyses sought differences between patients diagnosed with and patients not diagnosed with CRPS. All factors with p < 0.05 were included in a multivariable logistic regression model.
The covariates older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.029; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-1.048; p = 0.002), gender (women at greater risk, OR, 3.86; CI, 1.99-7.49; p < 0.001), concomitant fracture of the distal ulna (OR, 1.54; CI, 1.05-2.23; p = 0.029), open fracture (OR, 0.414; CI, 0.192-0.895; p = 0.025), and comorbid fibromyalgia (OR, 16.0; CI, 4.92-51.8; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a diagnosis of CRPS among patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Patients diagnosed with CRPS are more likely than other patients with a distal radius fracture to have had a bone scan (OR, 66.0; CI, 8.19-532; p < 0.001), physical or occupational therapy (OR, 3.89; CI, 2.68-5.67; p < 0.001), and subsequent wrist surgery (OR, 2.52; CI, 1.65-3.84; p < 0.001). No one had a stellate ganglion injection.
We found that a coded diagnosis of CPRS is uncommonly applied to patients on the higher range of pain, stiffness, and limitations after fracture of the distal radius-most commonly in women and in association with another nonspecific, objectively unverifiable diagnosis (fibromyalgia)-and that this label may lead to more testing and invasive treatment. Future research should address the utility and value of diagnoses that create subjective categories for aspects of human illness that occur on a continuum.
Level III, prognostic study.
复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)经常在手术后或受伤后恢复的患者中被诊断出来。共识诊断标准中包括的 CRPS 的症状和体征预计在受伤后出现。将连续出现的症状和体征归类为不成比例或不成比例是主观的,容易产生偏差。精神科医生和心理学家不诊断 CRPS,而是在其连续体上测量和治疗焦虑和灾难性思维。鉴于主观诊断(如 CRPS)的预期变化,本研究探讨了与使用该诊断相关的因素以及它如何影响护理。
问题/目的:(1)在桡骨远端骨折恢复的患者中,哪些因素与 CRPS 的诊断相关?(2)与没有 CRPS 的患者相比,被诊断为 CRPS 的桡骨远端骨折患者是否更有可能进行骨扫描、星状神经节阻滞、治疗或随后的手术?
使用 Truven 数据库,我们确定了 2012 年至 2014 年期间接受桡骨远端骨折治疗的 59765 名患者,其中 114 名(0.19%)被诊断为 CRPS。Truven Health MarketScan 数据库是一个商业保险患者的行政索赔数据集,本分析仅包括 2012 年至 2014 年期间完整入组的患者。双变量分析旨在寻找诊断为 CRPS 和未诊断为 CRPS 的患者之间的差异。所有 p<0.05 的因素均被纳入多变量逻辑回归模型。
年龄较大(优势比 [OR],1.029;95%置信区间 [CI],1.011-1.048;p=0.002)、女性(女性风险更高,OR,3.86;CI,1.99-7.49;p<0.001)、伴发桡骨远端骨折(OR,1.54;CI,1.05-2.23;p=0.029)、开放性骨折(OR,0.414;CI,0.192-0.895;p=0.025)和并发纤维肌痛(OR,16.0;CI,4.92-51.8;p<0.001)是与桡骨远端骨折患者 CRPS 诊断相关的独立因素。与其他桡骨远端骨折患者相比,被诊断为 CRPS 的患者更有可能接受骨扫描(OR,66.0;CI,8.19-532;p<0.001)、物理或职业治疗(OR,3.89;CI,2.68-5.67;p<0.001)和随后的腕关节手术(OR,2.52;CI,1.65-3.84;p<0.001)。没有人接受星状神经节注射。
我们发现,对于桡骨远端骨折后疼痛、僵硬和活动受限程度较高的患者,编码诊断为 CPRS 的情况并不常见-最常见于女性,并且与另一种非特异性、客观无法证实的诊断(纤维肌痛)有关-而这种标签可能会导致更多的检查和侵入性治疗。未来的研究应该解决为发生在连续体上的人类疾病的各个方面创建主观类别而产生的诊断的实用性和价值。
III 级,预后研究。