• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

XINSORB生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架与金属西罗莫司洗脱支架的头对头比较:猪模型180天随访

A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.

作者信息

Shen Li, Wu Yizhe, Ge Lei, Zhang Yaojun, Wang Qibing, Qian Juying, Qiu Zhifen, Ge Junbo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;33(10):1473-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1148-5. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-017-1148-5
PMID:28639098
Abstract

We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in porcine model. XINSORB scaffolds and metallic Firebird2™ stents were randomly implanted into minipigs' coronary arteries. Angiography, optical coherent tomography (OCT) and histopathological analyses were performed at post-procedure and 14-, 28-, 90-, 180-day follow-up. Thirty-two minipigs were enrolled. Eight XINSORB scaffolds and 8 Firebird2 stents were examined at each time point. Quantitative coronary angiography showed that in-scaffold late luminal loss (LLL) of XINSORB scaffold was 0.26 ± 0.13, 0.50 ± 0.16, 0.88 ± 0.29 and 0.43 ± 0.24 mm at 14-, 28, 90-, and 180-day follow-up respectively, and the corresponding diameter stenosis (DS) was 7.3 ± 4.7, 12.0 ± 9.5, 22.1 ± 8.0, and 16.0 ± 9.5%. Neither in-scaffold LLL nor DS of XINSORB scaffold was significantly different in comparison with Firebird2 stent. No difference of luminal area, device area, neointimal hyperplasia, and area stenosis was detected between two devices under OCT. Scaffold area of XINSORB remained steady through the observation. Histopathology revealed the similar findings. The greatest late recoil of XINSORB scaffold was about 4.12% at 90-day follow-up, which was comparable to Firebird2 stent. Both devices showed low injury or inflammation of vessel wall. XINSORB scaffold showed early neointimal coverage on struts within 28 days under scanning electron microscopy. XINSORB scaffold suppressed neointimal hyperplasia as effectively as Firebird2 did without obvious late device recoil during the 180 days follow-up. It is feasible to carry out clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of XINSORB scaffold for patients with coronary artery diseases.

摘要

我们旨在研究XINSORB生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架在猪模型中的安全性和有效性。将XINSORB支架和金属Firebird2™支架随机植入小型猪的冠状动脉。在术后以及14天、28天、90天、180天随访时进行血管造影、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和组织病理学分析。共纳入32只小型猪。每个时间点检查8个XINSORB支架和8个Firebird2支架。定量冠状动脉造影显示,XINSORB支架在14天、28天、90天和180天随访时的支架内晚期管腔丢失(LLL)分别为0.26±0.13、0.50±0.16、0.88±0.29和0.43±0.24mm,相应的直径狭窄(DS)分别为7.3±4.7%、12.0±9.5%、22.1±8.0%和16.0±9.5%。与Firebird2支架相比,XINSORB支架的支架内LLL和DS均无显著差异。在OCT下,两种器械之间未检测到管腔面积、器械面积、新生内膜增生和面积狭窄的差异。XINSORB的支架面积在观察期间保持稳定。组织病理学显示出相似的结果。XINSORB支架在90天随访时最大晚期回缩约为4.12%,与Firebird2支架相当。两种器械均显示血管壁损伤或炎症较轻。扫描电子显微镜下,XINSORB支架在28天内即可在支柱上出现早期新生内膜覆盖。在180天随访期间,XINSORB支架抑制新生内膜增生的效果与Firebird2支架相当,且无明显的晚期器械回缩。对冠状动脉疾病患者开展XINSORB支架安全性和有效性的临床试验是可行的。

相似文献

1
A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.XINSORB生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架与金属西罗莫司洗脱支架的头对头比较:猪模型180天随访
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;33(10):1473-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1148-5. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
Six-month outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in treating single de novo lesions in human coronary artery.XINSORB生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗人类冠状动脉单发性初发病变的6个月结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87 Suppl 1:630-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26404. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold in Porcine Coronary Artery at 6 Months.新型西罗莫司洗脱铁基可吸收冠状动脉支架在猪冠状动脉 6 个月的临床前评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 11;12(3):245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.020.
4
Healing score of the Xinsorb scaffold in the treatment of de novo lesions: 6-month imaging outcomes.Xinsorb支架治疗初发病变的愈合评分:6个月影像学结果。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;34(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1326-0. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
5
Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.随机比较 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架和 Mirage 微纤维西罗莫司洗脱支架的多模式影像学研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1115-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).首例人体生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架的评估:DESOLVE I 试验(载有依维莫司和生物可吸收聚合物的 DES 治疗原发性冠状动脉病变患者)的影像学和临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
Stent coverage and neointimal proliferation in bare metal stents postdilated with a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stents: prospective randomized study using optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up.紫杉醇洗脱球囊后扩张与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗裸金属支架:使用光学相干断层成像术在 6 个月随访时的前瞻性随机研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):760-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001146. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
Assessment of an asymmetrical coating stent with sirolimus released from ablumial matrix in porcine model.猪模型中评价一种载有从外膜基质释放的西罗莫司的不对称涂层支架。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Nov;101(11):917-27. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0476-7. Epub 2012 May 25.
9
Mechanism of Drug-Eluting Absorbable Metal Scaffold Restenosis: A Serial Optical Coherence Tomography Study.载药可吸收金属支架再狭窄的机制:一项系列光学相干断层扫描研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008657. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
10
Two-year longitudinal evaluation of a second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold with hybrid cell design in porcine coronary arteries.猪冠状动脉中第二代薄壁雷帕霉素洗脱生物可吸收冠状动脉支架的混合细胞设计的两年纵向评估。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(2):115-125. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0095. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds advances, challenges, and future directions.生物可吸收支架的进展、挑战及未来方向。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(7):4173-4183. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003424. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Advances in Fabrication Technologies for the Development of Next-Generation Cardiovascular Stents.用于下一代心血管支架开发的制造技术进展
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Nov 10;14(11):544. doi: 10.3390/jfb14110544.
3
Development of Biodegradable Polymeric Stents for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.可生物降解聚合物支架的开发用于心血管疾病的治疗。

本文引用的文献

1
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.生物可吸收血管支架与金属支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:ABSORB China 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2298-2309. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
2
Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
3
A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan.
Biomolecules. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):1245. doi: 10.3390/biom12091245.
4
Designing Better Cardiovascular Stent Materials - A Learning Curve.设计更好的心血管支架材料——一条学习曲线。
Adv Funct Mater. 2021 Jan 4;31(1). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202005361. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions.生物可吸收支架:现状与未来方向
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Nov 30;7:589571. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571. eCollection 2020.
6
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia.组织工程与再生医学:亚洲的成就、未来与可持续发展
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 24;8:83. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00083. eCollection 2020.
7
Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.《国际心血管影像杂志》2017年心血管成像相关内容
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun;34(6):833-848. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1349-6.
8
Healing score of the Xinsorb scaffold in the treatment of de novo lesions: 6-month imaging outcomes.Xinsorb支架治疗初发病变的愈合评分:6个月影像学结果。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;34(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1326-0. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
在冠状动脉疾病患者中评估依维莫司洗脱 Absorb 生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的随机试验:ABSORB 日本。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3332-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv435. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
5
Assessing bioresorbable coronary devices: methods and parameters.评估生物可吸收冠状动脉器械:方法和参数。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;7(11):1130-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架与金属依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变所致缺血性心脏病的比较(ABSORB II):一项随机对照临床试验的临床和操作次要终点 1 年中期分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):43-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61455-0. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
7
Therapeutic reendothelialization by induced pluripotent stem cells after vascular injury--brief report.血管损伤后诱导多能干细胞的治疗性再内皮化——简短报告。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013 Sep;33(9):2218-21. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301313. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
8
Comparison of acute recoil between bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid XINSORB stent and metallic stent in porcine model.生物可吸收聚左旋乳酸XINSORB支架与金属支架在猪模型中的急性回缩比较。
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:413956. doi: 10.1155/2012/413956. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
9
First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study.第二代可吸收依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的 6 个月和 2 年的首次系列评估:多模态影像学研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):620-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971549. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Safety and efficacy of cobalt chromium alloy based sirolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer in porcine model.钴铬合金载西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收聚合物支架在猪模型中的安全性和有效性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):983-9.