1 Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Assessment. 2019 Sep;26(6):1046-1058. doi: 10.1177/1073191117715729. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
This study examined item and scale functioning in the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) using an item response theory analysis. PPI-R protocols from 1,052 college student participants (348 male, 704 female) were analyzed. Analyses were conducted on the 131 self-report items comprising the PPI-R's eight content scales, using a graded response model. Scales collected a majority of their information about respondents possessing higher than average levels of the traits being measured. Each scale contained at least some items that evidenced limited ability to differentiate between respondents with differing levels of the trait being measured. Moreover, 80 items (61.1%) yielded significantly different responses between men and women presumably possessing similar levels of the trait being measured. Item performance was also influenced by the scoring format (directly scored vs. reverse-scored) of the items. Overall, the results suggest that the PPI-R, despite identifying psychopathic personality traits in individuals possessing high levels of those traits, may not identify these traits equally well for men and women, and scores are likely influenced by the scoring format of the individual item and scale.
本研究采用项目反应理论分析方法,考察了修正后的精神病态人格量表(PPI-R)中的项目和量表功能。对 1052 名大学生参与者(348 名男性,704 名女性)的 PPI-R 方案进行了分析。使用渐进反应模型对构成 PPI-R 的八个内容量表的 131 个自陈项目进行了分析。这些量表主要收集了那些具有高于平均水平特质的被试的信息。每个量表都包含至少一些项目,这些项目在衡量被试具有不同特质水平方面的区分能力有限。此外,80 个项目(61.1%)在具有相似特质水平的男性和女性之间产生了明显不同的反应,这些项目可能存在性别差异。项目表现还受到项目评分格式(直接评分与反向评分)的影响。总体而言,研究结果表明,尽管 PPI-R 能够识别具有高特质水平的个体的精神病态人格特质,但可能无法平等地识别男性和女性的这些特质,并且评分可能受到个体项目和量表评分格式的影响。