• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三因素精神变态量表的项目反应理论分析。

Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington State University.

Department of Kinesiology and Educational Psychology, Washington State University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2021 Aug;33(8):766-776. doi: 10.1037/pas0001022. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1037/pas0001022
PMID:33856827
Abstract

This study investigated item and scale functioning in the triarchic psychopathy measure (TriPM) using an item response theory (IRT) analysis. TriPM data collected from 937 (410 men and 527 women) college students and community members were analyzed. A graded response model was utilized to analyze the items comprising the TriPM's three scales. Exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) supported the unidimensionality of the Disinhibition and Meanness scales, whereas Boldness was best represented by two domains. Each TriPM scale was found to include some items that had limited ability to differentiate between respondents possessing varying levels of the trait being measured. Across all scales, 34 items (61%) yielded evidence of significantly different responding between men and women possessing similar levels of the underlying trait, or differential item functioning (DIF). The scoring format (i.e., directly scored vs. reverse scored) also influenced item functioning, especially when the given scale included a large majority of one scoring type. Overall, the IRT and DIF results suggest that the TriPM effectively identifies disinhibition and meanness in individuals possessing high levels of those traits, and boldness at lower levels, but does not seem to identify these traits equally well in men and women. Possible revisions to the Boldness scale as well as ideas for addressing female and male DIF were provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究采用项目反应理论(IRT)分析,调查了三因素精神病态度量表(TriPM)中的项目和量表功能。对 937 名(410 名男性和 527 名女性)大学生和社区成员收集的 TriPM 数据进行了分析。使用等级反应模型分析了构成 TriPM 的三个量表的项目。探索性因素分析(EFAs)支持了去抑制和卑鄙量表的单维性,而大胆性最好由两个领域来表示。发现 TriPM 的每个量表都包含一些项目,这些项目在区分具有不同测量特质水平的受访者方面能力有限。在所有量表中,有 34 项(61%)的项目存在证据表明,具有相似特质水平的男性和女性的反应存在显著差异,或存在项目功能差异(DIF)。评分格式(即直接评分与反向评分)也会影响项目功能,特别是当给定量表包含绝大多数一种评分类型时。总的来说,IRT 和 DIF 的结果表明,TriPM 有效地识别了具有高水平去抑制和卑鄙特质的个体,以及在较低水平的大胆特质,但似乎无法在男性和女性中同样有效地识别这些特质。提供了对大胆量表的可能修订以及解决男性和女性 DIF 的想法。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.三因素精神变态量表的项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Aug;33(8):766-776. doi: 10.1037/pas0001022. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Examining the Item-Level Structure of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure: Sharpening Assessment of Psychopathy Constructs.检验三因素精神变态度量表的项目水平结构:精神变态结构评估的精细化。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):429-445. doi: 10.1177/1073191120927786. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
Examining the factor structure and validity of the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy across measures.考察三因素模型在多种测量方法下的心理病理学结构和有效性。
Personal Disord. 2021 Mar;12(2):115-126. doi: 10.1037/per0000394. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Psychometric properties of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure: An item response theory approach.三因素精神病态度量表的心理测量特性:项目反应理论方法。
Personal Disord. 2018 May;9(3):217-227. doi: 10.1037/per0000241. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised.精神变态人格量表修订版的项目反应理论分析。
Assessment. 2019 Sep;26(6):1046-1058. doi: 10.1177/1073191117715729. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Genetic and environmental influences on disinhibition, boldness, and meanness as assessed by the triarchic psychopathy measure in 19-20-year-old twins.19-20 岁双胞胎的三因素精神病理学测量评估的抑制、大胆和卑鄙的遗传和环境影响。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jul;49(9):1500-1509. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002052. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Further evaluation of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure: Evidence from community adult and prisoner samples from Portugal.进一步评估三因素精神变态度量表:来自葡萄牙社区成年和囚犯样本的证据。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):e1-e14. doi: 10.1037/pas0000797. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Triarchic or septarchic?-Uncovering the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure's (TriPM) structure.三因素还是七因素?——揭示三因素精神病态量表(TriPM)的结构。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/per0000392. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
9
Examining the triarchic psychopathy measure and comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality in self-identified offender populations.审视自我认同罪犯群体中的三因素心理病态测量和心理病态人格综合评估。
Personal Disord. 2019 Jul;10(4):340-353. doi: 10.1037/per0000333. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Modeling the Structure of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure: Conceptual, Empirical, and Analytic Considerations.三因素精神病态量表结构的建模:概念、实证和分析考虑。
J Pers Disord. 2019 Aug;33(4):470-496. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_354. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.不同简版社交互动焦虑量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 3;17:3405-3418. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S486245. eCollection 2024.