• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西蒙任务中的模式切换:参照系的冲突。

Modality-switching in the Simon task: The clash of reference frames.

机构信息

Center for Brain and Cognition, Departament de Tecnologies de la Informació i les Comunicacions, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1478-1497. doi: 10.1037/xge0000342. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000342
PMID:28639796
Abstract

The representation of spatial information related to an event can influence behavior even when location is task-irrelevant, as in the case of Stimulus-Response (S-R) compatibility effects on the Simon task. However, unlike single-modality situations, which are often used to study the Simon effect, in real-life scenarios various sensory modalities provide spatial information coded in different coordinate systems. Here, we address the expression of S-R compatibility effects in mixed-modality contexts, where events can occur in 1 of various sensory modalities (i.e., vision, touch or audition). The results confirm that, in single-modality cases, Simon effects in vision are expressed in an external spatial frame of reference, while touch information is coded anatomically. Remarkably, when mixing visual and tactile trials in an unpredictable way, the Simon effect disappeared in vision whereas tactile Simon effects remained expressed in their own (anatomical) frame of reference. Mixing visual and auditory stimuli did not obliterate the visual Simon effect and S-R compatibility effects in an external reference frame were evident for both modalities. The extinction of visual Simon effects as a result of mixing visual and tactile modalities can be interpreted as a consequence of the dynamic reorganization of the weights associated to the different sources of spatial information at play. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

与事件相关的空间信息的表示即使在位置与任务无关的情况下也会影响行为,就像在西蒙任务中的刺激-反应(S-R)兼容性效应对位置的影响一样。然而,与通常用于研究西蒙效应的单模态情况不同,在现实生活场景中,各种感觉模态提供了以不同坐标系编码的空间信息。在这里,我们研究了混合模态情境中 S-R 兼容性效应的表达,其中事件可以发生在各种感觉模态(即视觉、触觉或听觉)之一中。结果证实,在单模态情况下,视觉中的西蒙效应在外部空间参照系中表现出来,而触觉信息则以解剖学方式编码。值得注意的是,当以不可预测的方式混合视觉和触觉试验时,西蒙效应在视觉中消失,而触觉西蒙效应仍然以其自身的(解剖学)参照系表示。混合视觉和听觉刺激并没有消除视觉西蒙效应,并且对于两种模态,外部参照系中的 S-R 兼容性效应都很明显。由于混合视觉和触觉模态,视觉西蒙效应的消失可以解释为与不同空间信息源相关的权重的动态重新组织的结果。

相似文献

1
Modality-switching in the Simon task: The clash of reference frames.西蒙任务中的模式切换:参照系的冲突。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1478-1497. doi: 10.1037/xge0000342. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
The interaction between emotion and executive control: Comparison between visual, auditory, and tactile modalities.情绪与执行控制之间的相互作用:视觉、听觉和触觉模态的比较。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1661-1674. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1199717. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
The breakdown of the Simon effect in cross-modal contexts: EEG evidence.跨模态情境下 Simon 效应的瓦解:EEG 证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Apr;47(7):832-844. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13882.
4
In touch with the Simon effect.与西蒙效应相关。
Exp Psychol. 2014;61(3):165-79. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000236.
5
Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.内源性空间注意中听觉、触觉和视觉之间的跨模态交互作用:关于准备状态和感觉调制的事件相关电位证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;14(2):254-71. doi: 10.1162/089892902317236885.
6
Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.听觉、触觉和视觉系统中与空间无关的模态驱动的注意捕获。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
7
Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.在盲文阅读任务中,被忽略的同时发生的视觉变化会隐式促进早期听觉变化检测。
J Integr Neurosci. 2013 Sep;12(3):385-99. doi: 10.1142/S0219635213500234. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
8
Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.使用双模态和双价刺激的模态和任务切换交互。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Jun;82(1):90-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
9
Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.基于刺激身份的跨模态一致性效应。
Brain Res. 2010 Oct 1;1354:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.058. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
10
Preferential processing of tactile events under conditions of divided attention.在注意力分散的情况下对触觉事件的优先处理。
Neuroreport. 2009 Oct 7;20(15):1392-6. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283319e25.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological distance affects real movements in virtual reality: distance to food in anorexia nervosa.心理距离影响虚拟现实中的真实动作:神经性厌食症中与食物的距离。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Aug 6;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01357-0.
2
The role of conflict processing in multisensory perception: behavioural and electroencephalography evidence.冲突处理在多感官感知中的作用:行为和脑电图证据。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 25;378(1886):20220346. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0346. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Different mechanisms of magnitude and spatial representation for tactile and auditory modalities.触觉和听觉模态的大小和空间表示的不同机制。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Oct;239(10):3123-3132. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06196-4. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
The Magnitude Effect on Tactile Spatial Representation: The Spatial-Tactile Association for Response Code (STARC) Effect.触觉空间表征中的量级效应:反应编码的空间触觉关联(STARC)效应。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 29;14:557063. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.557063. eCollection 2020.
6
The Roles of Attentional Shifts and Attentional Reengagement in Resolving The Spatial Compatibility Effect in Tactile Simon-like Tasks.注意转移和注意重新投入在解决触觉 Simon 类似任务中的空间兼容性效应中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 8;8(1):8760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27114-9.