Yasiry Zeid, Shorvon Simon D
Department of Medicine, University of Babylon/College of Medicine, Babil, Iraq.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Seizure. 2014 Mar;23(3):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
Systematic evaluation of published evidence-base of the efficacy of five antiepileptic drugs - lacosamide, levetiracetam, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital - in convulsive benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus.
Data sources included electronic databases, personal communication, and back tracing of references in pertinent studies. These were prospective and retrospective human studies presenting original data for participants with convulsive benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus. Interventions were intravenous lacosamide, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate. Outcome measured is clinically detectable cessation of seizure activity. Level-of-evidence was assessed according to Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine and The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessment of Risk. Twenty seven studies (798 cases of convulsive status epilepticus) were identified and 22 included in a meta-analysis. Random-effects analysis of dichotomous outcome of a single group estimate (proportion), with inverse variance weighting, was implemented. Several sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity were identified.
Efficacy of levetiracetam was 68.5% (95% CI: 56.2-78.7%), phenobarbital 73.6% (95% CI: 58.3-84.8%), phenytoin 50.2% (95% CI: 34.2-66.1%) and valproate 75.7% (95% CI: 63.7-84.8%). Lacosamide studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to insufficient data.
Valproate, levetiracetam and phenobarbital can all be used as first line therapy in benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus. The evidence does not support the first-line use of phenytoin. There is not enough evidence to support the routine use of lacosamide. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed.
系统评价已发表的关于五种抗癫痫药物——拉科酰胺、左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸盐、苯妥英和苯巴比妥——在惊厥性苯二氮䓬类药物难治性癫痫持续状态中的疗效的证据基础。
数据来源包括电子数据库、个人交流以及对相关研究参考文献的回溯。这些是前瞻性和回顾性人体研究,为惊厥性苯二氮䓬类药物难治性癫痫持续状态的参与者提供原始数据。干预措施为静脉注射拉科酰胺、左乙拉西坦、苯巴比妥、苯妥英和丙戊酸盐。测量的结局是临床上可检测到的癫痫活动停止。证据水平根据牛津循证医学中心和Cochrane协作网的风险评估工具进行评估。共识别出27项研究(798例惊厥性癫痫持续状态病例),其中22项纳入荟萃分析。采用单组估计(比例)二分结局的随机效应分析,并进行逆方差加权。识别出了临床和方法学异质性的几个来源。
左乙拉西坦的疗效为68.5%(95%置信区间:56.2 - 78.7%),苯巴比妥为73.6%(95%置信区间:58.3 - 84.8%),苯妥英为50.2%(95%置信区间:34.2 - 66.1%),丙戊酸盐为75.7%(95%置信区间:63.7 - 84.8%)。由于数据不足,拉科酰胺的研究被排除在荟萃分析之外。
丙戊酸盐、左乙拉西坦和苯巴比妥均可作为苯二氮䓬类药物难治性癫痫持续状态的一线治疗药物。证据不支持将苯妥英作为一线用药。没有足够的证据支持常规使用拉科酰胺。迫切需要进行随机对照试验。