• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1984年至2014年中国对脓毒症研究的贡献不断增长：一项文献计量学研究。

China's growing contribution to sepsis research from 1984 to 2014: A bibliometric study.

作者信息

Zhang Kai, Zhao Jialian, Chu Lihua, Jin Yue, Cheng Baoli, Xie Guohao, Wang Yan, Fang Xiangming

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007275.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000007275
PMID:28640137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5484245/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the global trends of sepsis research and investigate China's contribution by comparing the quantity and quality of sepsis-related publications.

METHODS

Sepsis-related publications were main retrieved from the Web of Science online database by using the keywords "sepsis" or "septic shock." Bibliometric indicators, including the number of publications, total citation frequency, citation frequency per paper, h-index, research type, orientation, organization, author, journal, and funding support were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1984 to 2014, a total of 70,564 papers regarding sepsis research were published worldwide. 3.60% of which were contributed by authors from Chinese institutions. Although this contribution was less than the Unites States, Germany, England, France or Japan, a notable trend of increase in a number of scientific publications (r  =  0.57, P < .001), with an average annual growth rate of 20.78%, was observed. The quality of the publications was relatively low in China. Basic research was a clear dominant representation, accounting for 50.46% of China's sepsis research. The research centers in China were mainly located in Beijing (5 centers), Shanghai (4 centers), and Hong Kong (3 centers). The National Natural Science Foundation of China supported the most Chinese sepsis researches.

CONCLUSION

Global sepsis research developed swiftly during the 1984 to 2014 period. The USA was in the forefront of sepsis research. Although the data indicated that China had a large increasing rate of publications, there was a considerable gap in the quality of articles between China and other developed countries.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析脓毒症研究的全球趋势，并通过比较脓毒症相关出版物的数量和质量来调查中国的贡献。

方法

通过使用关键词“脓毒症”或“脓毒性休克”，主要从科学网在线数据库中检索脓毒症相关出版物。分析文献计量指标，包括出版物数量、总被引频次、每篇论文的被引频次、h指数、研究类型、方向、机构、作者、期刊和资金支持。

结果

1984年至2014年，全球共发表了70564篇关于脓毒症研究的论文。其中3.60%由中国机构的作者贡献。尽管这一贡献低于美国、德国、英国、法国或日本，但观察到科学出版物数量有显著的增长趋势（r = 0.57，P <.001），平均年增长率为20.78%。中国出版物的质量相对较低。基础研究是明显的主导形式，占中国脓毒症研究的50.46%。中国的研究中心主要位于北京（5个中心）、上海（4个中心）和香港（3个中心）。中国国家自然科学基金支持的中国脓毒症研究最多。

结论

1984年至2014年期间，全球脓毒症研究迅速发展。美国处于脓毒症研究的前沿。尽管数据表明中国的出版物增长率很高，但中国与其他发达国家在文章质量方面仍存在相当大的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/6af6dce59abb/medi-96-e7275-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/2ee4374f3d62/medi-96-e7275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/7dc9dddfc0a4/medi-96-e7275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/076fcc25250a/medi-96-e7275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/41902afecce7/medi-96-e7275-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/f8e04ffd3038/medi-96-e7275-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/6af6dce59abb/medi-96-e7275-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/2ee4374f3d62/medi-96-e7275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/7dc9dddfc0a4/medi-96-e7275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/076fcc25250a/medi-96-e7275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/41902afecce7/medi-96-e7275-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/f8e04ffd3038/medi-96-e7275-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8816/5484245/6af6dce59abb/medi-96-e7275-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
China's growing contribution to sepsis research from 1984 to 2014: A bibliometric study.1984年至2014年中国对脓毒症研究的贡献不断增长：一项文献计量学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007275.
2
China's growing contribution to global intracranial aneurysm research (1991-2012): a bibliometric study.中国对全球颅内动脉瘤研究的贡献增长（1991 - 2012年）：一项文献计量学研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e91594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091594. eCollection 2014.
3
China's Contribution to Anesthesiology Research: A 10-Year Survey of the Literature.中国对麻醉学研究的贡献：一项为期10年的文献调查
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1640-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001225.
4
The publication trend of neuropathic pain in the world and China: a 20-years bibliometric analysis.世界和中国神经病理性疼痛的发表趋势：20 年文献计量分析。
J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 15;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0941-4.
5
Growing trend of China's contribution to the field of spine: a 10-year survey of the literature.中国在脊柱领域贡献的增长趋势：一项为期10年的文献调查
Eur Spine J. 2015 Aug;24(8):1806-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4030-y. Epub 2015 May 24.
6
[The characteristics and citation analysis of the publications in during 2016].[2016年期间某刊物出版物的特征及引文分析] （这里原文中“during 2016”前面应该有具体刊物名称，翻译时按实际情况补充完整）
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 29;100(48):3903-3910. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201117-03122.
7
Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Research on lncRNA: A Swiftly Expanding Trend.lncRNA 全球科学研究的文献计量分析：迅速扩张的趋势。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 27;2018:7625078. doi: 10.1155/2018/7625078. eCollection 2018.
8
Publication trends of research on COVID-19 and host immune response: A bibliometric analysis.COVID-19 与宿主免疫反应研究的发表趋势：文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;10:939053. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.939053. eCollection 2022.
9
Chinese academic contribution to burns: A comprehensive bibliometrics analysis from 1985 to 2014.中国烧伤领域的学术贡献：1985年至2014年的综合文献计量学分析
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1463-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
10
[Bibliometric analysis of scientific articles on epidemiological study of burns in China].[中国烧伤流行病学研究科学论文的文献计量学分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 20;33(4):233-237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.04.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Global research trends in prediction of difficult airways: A bibliometric and visualization study.全球预测困难气道研究趋势：文献计量学和可视化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33776. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033776.
2
Global Research Trends in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.全膝关节置换翻修术的全球研究趋势：一项文献计量学与可视化研究
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Mar 10;55(5):1335-1347. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00390-w. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research: A Bibliometric Analysis over a 50-Year Period.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends of triple negative breast cancer research (2007-2015): A bibliometric study.三阴性乳腺癌研究趋势（2007 - 2015年）：一项文献计量学研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(46):e5427. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005427.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis.理解文献计量参数与分析。
系统性红斑狼疮研究：50 年文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137095.
4
Global Research Trends in Shock Wave for Therapy from 1990 to 2019: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.全球 1990 年至 2019 年治疗性冲击波研究的趋势：文献计量学和可视化研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 7;2021:3802319. doi: 10.1155/2021/3802319. eCollection 2021.
5
Whether productive authors using the national health insurance database also achieve higher individual research metrics: A bibliometric study.使用国家健康保险数据库的高产作者是否也能获得更高的个人研究指标：一项文献计量学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18631. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018631.
6
Publication Trends for Alzheimer's Disease Worldwide and in China: A 30-Year Bibliometric Analysis.全球及中国阿尔茨海默病的发表趋势：一项30年的文献计量分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 9;13:259. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00259. eCollection 2019.
Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):736-46. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140036.
4
Epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units in mainland China.中国大陆重症监护病房中严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学及转归
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 16;9(9):e107181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107181. eCollection 2014.
5
[National Natural Science Foundation of China promotes the development of Chinese medicine in China--an analysis of Chinese medicine project funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China in the last decade].[中国国家自然科学基金推动中国中医药发展——对过去十年中国国家自然科学基金资助的中医药项目的分析]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;33(11):1557-60.
6
Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.美国严重脓毒症发病率和死亡率的基准研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8.
7
Comparative study of scientific publications in urology and nephrology journals originating from USA, China and Japan (2001-2010).比较研究 2001-2010 年源自美国、中国和日本的泌尿学和肾脏病学期刊上的科学出版物。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042200. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
8
Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis.澳大利亚、加拿大、德国、荷兰、英国和美国的初级保健研究产出：文献计量分析。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 8;342:d1028. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1028.
9
Pathological research output in China and other top-ranking countries: 10-year survey of the literature.中国及其他顶尖国家的病理学研究产出：文献 10 年调查。
Pathol Res Pract. 2010 Dec 15;206(12):835-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
10
The use of bibliometric indicators to help peer-review assessment.使用文献计量指标辅助同行评审评估。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0004-2. Epub 2009 Feb 14.