• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发作后抑制程度取决于磁休克治疗和电休克治疗中的癫痫诱发时间。

Degree of Postictal Suppression Depends on Seizure Induction Time in Magnetic Seizure Therapy and Electroconvulsive Therapy.

作者信息

Kayser Sarah, Bewernick Bettina H, Soehle Martin, Switala Christina, Gippert Sabrina M, Dreimueller Nadine, Schlaepfer Thomas E

机构信息

From the Departments of *Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, and †Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; ‡Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; and §Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J ECT. 2017 Sep;33(3):167-175. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000425.

DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000425
PMID:28640168
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Anesthesia is required for both magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), although it has anticonvulsant properties. In this case, bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, a specific electroencephalogram-derived monitoring, can be used to find the optimal seizure induction time during anesthesia to elicit adequate seizures. A measurement of seizure adequacy in electroencephalogram is the postictal suppression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of seizure induction time on the degree of postictal suppression by comparing BIS versus no-BIS monitoring in MST and ECT.

METHODS

Twenty patients with treatment-resistant depression were randomly assigned to either MST or ECT. Each patient underwent 3 treatments with the determination of seizure induction time by defined prestimulation BIS (BIS condition) and 3 treatments with determination of seizure induction time by controlled clinical trial protocol (no-BIS condition). Statistical analysis was calculated by repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The degree of postictal suppression was more pronounced in both MST and ECT, with BIS monitoring. In this connection, no differences between MST and ECT were found. Seizure induction time was significantly later in the BIS condition (181.3 ± 6 seconds) compared with the no-BIS condition (114.3 ± 12 seconds) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequacy of seizures, in the form of the degree of postictal suppression, was superior by determining the seizure induction time with BIS in both MST and ECT. Further research is needed to investigate the correlation between the degree of postictal suppression and treatment response.

摘要

目的

尽管麻醉具有抗惊厥特性,但磁休克治疗(MST)和电休克治疗(ECT)都需要麻醉。在这种情况下,脑电双频指数(BIS)监测,一种特定的脑电图衍生监测方法,可用于在麻醉期间找到最佳的癫痫发作诱导时间以引发足够的癫痫发作。脑电图中癫痫发作充分性的一个衡量指标是发作后抑制。本研究的目的是通过比较MST和ECT中BIS监测与非BIS监测,探讨癫痫发作诱导时间对发作后抑制程度的影响。

方法

20例难治性抑郁症患者被随机分配接受MST或ECT治疗。每位患者接受3次治疗,通过定义的预刺激BIS确定癫痫发作诱导时间(BIS组),以及3次通过对照临床试验方案确定癫痫发作诱导时间的治疗(非BIS组)。采用重复测量方差分析进行统计分析。

结果

在MST和ECT中,采用BIS监测时发作后抑制程度更为明显。在这方面,未发现MST和ECT之间存在差异。与非BIS组(114.3±12秒)相比,BIS组的癫痫发作诱导时间显著更晚(181.3±6秒)(P<0.001)。

结论

在MST和ECT中,通过BIS确定癫痫发作诱导时间,以发作后抑制程度形式表现的癫痫发作充分性更佳。需要进一步研究来探讨发作后抑制程度与治疗反应之间的相关性。

相似文献

1
Degree of Postictal Suppression Depends on Seizure Induction Time in Magnetic Seizure Therapy and Electroconvulsive Therapy.发作后抑制程度取决于磁休克治疗和电休克治疗中的癫痫诱发时间。
J ECT. 2017 Sep;33(3):167-175. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000425.
2
Bilateral bispectral index monitoring during and after electroconvulsive therapy compared with magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant depression.在电抽搐治疗期间和之后进行双侧双谱指数监测与磁惊厥治疗用于治疗抵抗性抑郁症的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):695-702. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet410. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
3
Safety and feasibility of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in major depression: randomized within-subject comparison with electroconvulsive therapy.磁休克治疗(MST)用于重度抑郁症的安全性和可行性:与电休克治疗的随机受试者内比较
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Oct;28(10):1852-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300229.
4
Comparable seizure characteristics in magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy for major depression.磁惊厥治疗与电惊厥治疗在治疗重度抑郁症中的相似惊厥特征。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1541-50. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
5
Seizure Adequacy Markers and the Prediction of Electroconvulsive Therapy Response.癫痫发作充分性标志物与电休克治疗反应的预测
J ECT. 2016 Jun;32(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000274.
6
Can the bispectral index be used to predict seizure time and awakening after electroconvulsive therapy?脑电双频指数能否用于预测电休克治疗后的癫痫发作时间及苏醒情况?
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1636-1639. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066018.13553.08.
7
The bispectral electroencephalogram during modified electroconvulsive therapy under propofol anesthesia: relation with seizure duration and awakening.丙泊酚麻醉下改良电抽搐治疗中的双谱指数脑电图:与抽搐持续时间和苏醒的关系。
J ECT. 2011 Jun;27(2):114-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181df4ebb.
8
Burst suppression: a more valid marker of postictal central inhibition?爆发抑制:一种更有效的癫痫后中枢抑制标志物?
J ECT. 2013 Mar;29(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182622c0e.
9
Anesthetic considerations for magnetic seizure therapy: a novel therapy for severe depression.磁休克治疗的麻醉注意事项:一种治疗重度抑郁症的新疗法。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):76-80, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221182.71648.a3.
10
Antidepressant effects, of magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy, in treatment-resistant depression.磁惊厥治疗和电惊厥治疗对治疗抵抗性抑郁症的抗抑郁作用。
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of MST in clinical application: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies.MST在临床应用中的安全性:随机对照研究的系统评价
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1539008. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1539008. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of seizure duration and utility of using SedLine EEG tracing in veterans undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: a retrospective analysis.评估接受电休克治疗的退伍军人的癫痫发作持续时间以及使用SedLine脑电图描记的效用:一项回顾性分析。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Feb 6;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00143-9.
3
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Seizure Therapy and Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review.
磁休克疗法与电休克疗法治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 28;13(3):449. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030449.
4
Parsing the Network Mechanisms of Electroconvulsive Therapy.解析电抽搐疗法的网络机制。
Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 1;92(3):193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较磁惊厥疗法与电惊厥疗法治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和认知功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;11(1):437. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01560-y.
6
Factors Predicting Ictal Quality in Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Sessions.双侧电休克治疗期间发作质量的预测因素
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 12;11(6):781. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060781.
7
Magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant depression.磁惊厥疗法治疗难治性抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 16;6(6):CD013528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013528.pub2.
8
Hippocampal subregions and networks linked with antidepressant response to electroconvulsive therapy.与电休克治疗抗抑郁反应相关的海马亚区和神经网络。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;26(8):4288-4299. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0666-z. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.非手术性脑刺激治疗成人重度抑郁发作急性期的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 27;364:l1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1079.