Cheung Ka-Shing, Seto Wai-Kay, Fung James, Lai Ching-Lung, Yuen Man-Fung
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 22;8(6):e100. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.23.
We aimed to validate the prognostic models for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in Chinese patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid (UCDA), and to compare their performances in predicting the long-term survival.
Chinese patients with PBC from a tertiary center were identified via electronic search of hospital medical registry. Risk factors associated with adverse events (liver transplantation or death from liver-related causes including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver decompensation) were determined. Transplant-free survival was defined as survival free of liver-related death or transplantation.
Of the 144 patients, 41 (28.5%) had baseline cirrhosis. The median age at diagnosis was 57.8 years. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 40 patients died (21 liver-related; 19 non-liver-related), 12 developed HCC, and 10 underwent transplantations. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year transplant-free survival probabilities were 91.0%, 78.1%, and 58.9%, respectively. Independent risk factors for adverse events were increasing age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05), cirrhosis (HR 8.53), and suboptimal treatment response (HR 3.06). Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index at 1 year (APRI-r1) in combination with treatment response optimized the risk stratification. The performances of the GLOBE, UK-PBC scores, Rotterdam criteria, and APRI-r1 were comparable in predicting adverse events. The area under receiver operating curves within 5, 10, and 15 years were as follows-GLOBE score: 0.83, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively; UK-PBC score: 0.89, 0.83, and 0.79, respectively; Rotterdam criteria: 0.82, 0.76, and 0.80, respectively; APRI-r1: 0.80, 0.83, and 0.77, respectively.
The UK-PBC, GLOBE scores, Rotterdam criteria, and APRI-r1 had good and comparable prognostic prediction values for Chinese PBC patients receiving UCDA.
我们旨在验证熊去氧胆酸(UCDA)治疗的中国原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者的预后模型,并比较它们在预测长期生存方面的表现。
通过电子检索医院医疗登记系统,确定来自三级中心的中国PBC患者。确定与不良事件(肝移植或因包括肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝失代偿在内的肝脏相关原因死亡)相关的危险因素。无移植生存定义为无肝脏相关死亡或移植的生存。
144例患者中,41例(28.5%)有基线肝硬化。诊断时的中位年龄为57.8岁。在中位随访7.0年期间,40例患者死亡(21例与肝脏相关;19例与肝脏无关),12例发生HCC,10例接受了移植。5年、10年和15年的无移植生存概率分别为91.0%、78.1%和58.9%。不良事件的独立危险因素为年龄增加(风险比(HR)1.05)、肝硬化(HR 8.53)和治疗反应欠佳(HR 3.06)。1年时的天冬氨酸转氨酶/血小板比值指数(APRI-r1)与治疗反应相结合优化了风险分层。GLOBE、英国PBC评分、鹿特丹标准和APRI-r1在预测不良事件方面的表现相当。5年、10年和15年内受试者工作曲线下面积如下——GLOBE评分:分别为0.83、0.85和0.85;英国PBC评分:分别为0.89、0.83和0.79;鹿特丹标准:分别为0.82、0.76和0.80;APRI-r1:分别为0.80、0.83和0.77。
英国PBC、GLOBE评分、鹿特丹标准和APRI-r1对接受UCDA治疗的中国PBC患者具有良好且相当的预后预测价值。