• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众包健康数据:与美国全国调查的可比性,2013 - 2015年

Crowdsourced Health Data: Comparability to a US National Survey, 2013-2015.

作者信息

Yank Veronica, Agarwal Sanjhavi, Loftus Pooja, Asch Steven, Rehkopf David

机构信息

Veronica Yank and Sanjhavi Agarwal are with the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Pooja Loftus is with the Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Steven Asch is with the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, and the Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University. David Rehkopf is with the Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1283-1289. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824
PMID:28640681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508142/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the generalizability of crowdsourced, electronic health data from self-selected individuals using a national survey as a reference.

METHODS

Using the world's largest crowdsourcing platform in 2015, we collected data on characteristics known to influence cardiovascular disease risk and identified comparable data from the 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used age-stratified logistic regression models to identify differences among groups.

RESULTS

Crowdsourced respondents were younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic and White, and had higher educational attainment. Those aged 40 to 59 years were similar to US adults in the rates of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Those aged 18 to 39 years were less similar, whereas those aged 60 to 75 years were underrepresented among crowdsourced respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Crowdsourced health data might be most generalizable to adults aged 40 to 59 years, but studies of younger or older populations, racial and ethnic minorities, or those with lower educational attainment should approach crowdsourced data with caution. Public Health Implications. Policymakers, the national Precision Medicine Initiative, and others planning to use crowdsourced data should take explicit steps to define and address anticipated underrepresentation by important population subgroups.

摘要

目的

以一项全国性调查为参照,确定来自自我选择个体的众包电子健康数据的可推广性。

方法

2015年,我们利用全球最大的众包平台,收集了已知会影响心血管疾病风险的特征数据,并从2013年行为风险因素监测系统中识别出可比数据。我们使用年龄分层逻辑回归模型来识别组间差异。

结果

众包调查对象更年轻,更有可能是非西班牙裔白人,且受教育程度更高。40至59岁人群在吸烟、糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症发生率方面与美国成年人相似。18至39岁人群的相似性较低,而60至75岁人群在众包调查对象中占比不足。

结论

众包健康数据可能对40至59岁的成年人最具可推广性,但对更年轻或更年长人群、少数种族和族裔群体或受教育程度较低人群的研究,在使用众包数据时应谨慎。对公共卫生的影响。政策制定者、国家精准医学计划以及其他计划使用众包数据的机构,应采取明确措施,界定并解决重要人群亚组预期代表性不足的问题。

相似文献

1
Crowdsourced Health Data: Comparability to a US National Survey, 2013-2015.众包健康数据:与美国全国调查的可比性,2013 - 2015年
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1283-1289. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Crowdsourced data collection for public health: A comparison with nationally representative, population tobacco use data.众包数据收集在公共卫生中的应用:与全国代表性、人口烟草使用数据的比较。
Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.众包一个规范性自然语言数据集:亚马逊土耳其机器人与实验室数据收集的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 20;15(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2620.
4
Crowdsourcing data collection of the retail tobacco environment: case study comparing data from crowdsourced workers to trained data collectors.零售烟草环境的众包数据收集:将众包工作者的数据与训练有素的数据收集者的数据进行比较的案例研究。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e6-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051298. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
State-specific prevalence of selected chronic disease-related characteristics--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001.特定慢性病相关特征的州患病率——行为危险因素监测系统,2001年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 22;52(8):1-80.
6
REACH 2010 Surveillance for Health Status in Minority Communities --- United States, 2001--2002.2010年美国少数族裔社区健康状况监测——2001 - 2002年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Aug 27;53(6):1-36.
7
Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research.全球化与众包生物医学研究
Br Med Bull. 2016 Dec;120(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw044. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
9
Associations Between Cardiovascular Health and Health-Related Quality of Life, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013.心血管健康与健康相关生活质量之间的关联,行为危险因素监测系统,2013年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jul 28;13:E99. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160073.
10
Asthma incidence among children and adults: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance system asthma call-back survey--United States, 2006-2008.儿童和成人中的哮喘发病率:行为危险因素监测系统哮喘回访调查结果——美国,2006 - 2008年
J Asthma. 2012 Feb;49(1):16-22. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.637594.

引用本文的文献

1
The Daily Lives of Crowdsourced U.S. Respondents: A Time Use Comparison of MTurk, Prolific, and ATUS.众包的美国受访者的日常生活:亚马逊土耳其机器人、Prolific和美国时间使用调查(ATUS)的比较
Sociol Methodol. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.1177/00811750241312226.
2
Promoting HPV Vaccination in College Students Through Educational Video: Results from a Randomized Trial.通过教育视频促进大学生接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗:一项随机试验的结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 30;13(6):587. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060587.
3
Understanding Membership in Alternative Health Social Media Groups and Its Association with COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.了解替代健康社交媒体群组中的成员身份及其与新冠病毒和流感疫苗接种的关联:基于网络的横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 5;8:e54092. doi: 10.2196/54092.
4
Sources of Environmental Reinforcement and Engagement in Health Risk Behaviors Among a General Population Sample of US Adults.环境强化源与美国成年人一般人群样本中健康风险行为的参与。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;21(11):1390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111390.
5
Episodic future thinking in type 2 diabetes: Further development and validation of the Health Information Thinking control for clinical trials.2 型糖尿病的偶发性未来思维:用于临床试验的健康信息思维控制的进一步开发和验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289478. eCollection 2023.
6
Helicobacter pylori treatment knowledge, access and barriers: A cross-sectional study.幽门螺杆菌治疗知识、途径和障碍:一项横断面研究。
Helicobacter. 2023 Apr;28(2):e12954. doi: 10.1111/hel.12954. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Increasing Cervical Cancer Prevention Through HPV Testing: Challenges in Developing Persuasive Messages.通过 HPV 检测增加宫颈癌预防:制定有说服力信息的挑战。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):823-824. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0179.
8
A User Interface for Optimizing Radiologist Engagement in Image Data Curation for Artificial Intelligence.一种用于优化放射科医生参与人工智能图像数据管理的用户界面。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Nov 27;1(6):e180095. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180095. eCollection 2019 Nov.
9
Distinctiveness and significance of body dissatisfaction and overvaluation among Latinx/Hispanic and White men and women.拉丁裔/西班牙裔和白种男女的身体不满和过度重视的独特性和意义。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Mar;54(3):354-364. doi: 10.1002/eat.23413. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
A roadmap for precision medicine research recruitment: empirical assessment of the public's willingness to participate.精准医学研究招募的路线图:公众参与意愿的实证评估。
Per Med. 2020 Sep;17(5):345-359. doi: 10.2217/pme-2019-0125. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.基因误诊与健康差异的可能性。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):655-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1507092.
2
The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery.量化自我:大数据科学和生物发现的根本性颠覆
Big Data. 2013 Jun;1(2):85-99. doi: 10.1089/big.2012.0002.
3
Using the Web to Collect Data on Sensitive Behaviours: A Study Looking at Mode Effects on the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.利用网络收集敏感行为数据:一项关于方式效应的研究——以英国全国性态度与生活方式调查为例
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0147983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147983. eCollection 2016.
4
Publicly Available Online Tool Facilitates Real-Time Monitoring Of Vaccine Conversations And Sentiments.公开可用的在线工具助力疫苗相关对话和情绪的实时监测。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):341-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1092.
5
Online Social Networks for Crowdsourced Multimedia-Involved Behavioral Testing: An Empirical Study.用于众包多媒体行为测试的在线社交网络:一项实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 11;6:1991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01991. eCollection 2015.
6
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Flu Near You: Crowdsourced Symptom Reporting Spanning 2 Influenza Seasons.你身边的流感:跨越两个流感季节的众包症状报告
Am J Public Health. 2015 Oct;105(10):2124-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302696. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
Sun Protection Belief Clusters: Analysis of Amazon Mechanical Turk Data.防晒信念集群:亚马逊土耳其机器人数据的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):673-678. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0882-4.
9
Crowdsourcing for conducting randomized trials of internet delivered interventions in people with serious mental illness: A systematic review.众包用于对患有严重精神疾病的人群开展互联网干预的随机试验:一项系统综述。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Flu and Finances: Influenza Outbreaks and Loan Defaults in US Cities, 2004-2012.流感与财政:2004 - 2012年美国城市的流感爆发与贷款违约
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):e75-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302671. Epub 2015 Jul 16.