School of Psychological Sciences, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Department of Psychology, Liffrig Family School of Education and Behavioral Sciences, University of Mary, Bismarck, ND, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jan;35(1):10-17. doi: 10.1002/da.22666. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Although depression is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is unknown whether this risk varies across depressive disorder subtypes. Thus, we investigated atypical major depressive disorder (MDD) and double depression as predictors of new-onset CVD in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.
Prospective data from 28,726 adults initially free of CVD who participated in Wave 1 (2001-2002) and Wave 2 (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) were examined. Lifetime depressive disorder subtypes (Wave 1) and incident CVD (Wave 2) were determined by structured interviews.
We identified 1,116 incident CVD cases. In demographics adjusted models, the atypical MDD group had a higher odds of incident CVD than the no depression history (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.71-2.81, P < .001), dysthymic disorder only (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39, P = .019), and nonatypical MDD (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.91, P = .006) groups. Likewise, the double depression group had a higher odds of incident CVD than the no depression history (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.92-2.45, P < .001), dysthymic disorder only (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.16-2.19, P = .004), and MDD only (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.20-1.77, P < .001) groups. Relationships were similar but attenuated after adjustment for CVD risk factors and anxiety disorders.
Adults with atypical MDD or double depression may be subgroups of the depressed population at particularly high risk of new-onset CVD. Thus, these subgroups may (a) be driving the overall depression-CVD relationship and (b) be in need of earlier and/or more intense CVD primary prevention efforts to reduce their excess CVD burden.
尽管抑郁症是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个风险因素,但尚不清楚这种风险在不同的抑郁障碍亚型中是否存在差异。因此,我们在一个具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本中,研究了非典型性重度抑郁症(MDD)和双重抑郁症作为新发 CVD 的预测因子。
前瞻性数据来自于 28726 名最初无 CVD 的成年人,他们参加了全国酒精相关情况流行病学调查(NESARC)的第 1 波(2001-2002 年)和第 2 波(2004-2005 年)。通过结构访谈确定终生抑郁障碍亚型(第 1 波)和新发 CVD(第 2 波)。
我们确定了 1116 例新发 CVD 病例。在调整了人口统计学因素的模型中,非典型性 MDD 组发生 CVD 的几率高于无抑郁史(OR=2.19,95%CI:1.71-2.81,P<.001)、心境恶劣障碍(OR=1.61,95%CI:1.08-2.39,P=.019)和非非典型性 MDD(OR=1.46,95%CI:1.11-1.91,P=.006)组。同样,双重抑郁组发生 CVD 的几率高于无抑郁史(OR=2.17,95%CI:1.92-2.45,P<.001)、心境恶劣障碍(OR=1.59,95%CI:1.16-2.19,P=.004)和 MDD (OR=1.46,95%CI:1.20-1.77,P<.001)组。在调整 CVD 风险因素和焦虑障碍后,关系仍然相似,但有所减弱。
非典型性 MDD 或双重抑郁的成年人可能是新发 CVD 风险特别高的抑郁人群中的亚组。因此,这些亚组可能是(a)驱动抑郁与 CVD 整体关系的因素,以及(b)需要进行更早和/或更强化的 CVD 一级预防措施,以降低其过度的 CVD 负担。