a School of Medicine , Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.
b School of Medicine , Federal University of Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Med Teach. 2017 Oct;39(10):1057-1064. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1337878. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
To date there have been no randomized studies that assess whether "Spirituality and Health" (S/H) programs are, indeed, effective, or not. We sought to evaluate if an intervention in teaching S/H fosters competence changes in healthcare students.
A randomized controlled trial was carried out. Students were randomized into two groups: an Intervention Group (a theoretical-practical course in S/H) and a control group (waiting list). Students' S/H knowledge, attitudes, and skills (through a simulated patient) were assessed.
A total of 49 students were evaluated. Students in the intervention group received higher scores on knowledge tests, felt more comfortable and prepared to talk about religious/spiritual beliefs with patients, more readily recognized importance of hospital chaplains, and more frequently held the opinion that addressing spirituality is important. Furthermore, a breaking down of S/H barriers was identified. Students also demonstrated more ability in obtaining a patient's spiritual history when compared to the control group.
There were some differences on knowledge, attitudes, and spiritual history skills between students who participated in the S/H teaching strategy and students who have not been exposed to the theme. These results might foster discussion for the development of new educational strategies about the subject.
迄今为止,尚无随机研究评估“灵性与健康”(S/H)项目是否有效。我们试图评估在教学中干预 S/H 是否会促进医学生能力的变化。
进行了一项随机对照试验。学生被随机分为两组:干预组(S/H 的理论-实践课程)和对照组(等待名单)。评估了学生的 S/H 知识、态度和技能(通过模拟患者)。
共评估了 49 名学生。干预组的学生在知识测试中得分更高,与患者谈论宗教/精神信仰时感到更加舒适和准备充分,更愿意认识到医院牧师的重要性,并且更频繁地认为解决精神问题很重要。此外,还发现了 S/H 障碍的突破。与对照组相比,学生在获取患者的精神病史方面也表现出更高的能力。
参加 S/H 教学策略的学生与未接触该主题的学生在知识、态度和精神病史技能方面存在一些差异。这些结果可能会为制定关于该主题的新教育策略提供讨论。