Pau Massimiliano, Porta Micaela, Coghe Giancarlo, Corona Federica, Pilloni Giuseppina, Lorefice Lorena, Marrosu Maria Giovanna, Cocco Eleonora
Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Jul;15:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
In people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS), balance assessment is essential in estimating the risk of falls, monitoring disease progression and verifying the effectiveness of rehabilitative treatment. Clinical tools and instrumental techniques are available for testing static and dynamic balance, but the relationship between such abilities is still not clear. Having information about this link would be important in properly planning the type and number of tests to administer.
One hundred and six pwMS (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS 0-6.5) stratified in three sub-groups (Class 1 EDSS 0-1.5, Class 2 EDSS 2-4 and Class 3 EDSS 4.5-6.5) and 42 healthy controls (HC) participated in the study. All underwent static posturography and instrumented Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) performed using a wearable inertial sensor. Raw data were processed to extract postural sway features, overall duration of TUG and its main sub-phases (i.e. sit-to-stand, 180° turns and stand-to-sit).
All sway parameters of pwMS of Classes 2 and 3, as well as total TUG duration and time necessary to perform 180° turns, were found significantly higher than HC and Class 1 participants. However, poor correlations were found between sway and TUG parameters. When pwMS are grouped, small/moderate correlations (in the range 0.20-0.41) were found between all sway parameters and total TUG duration.
Static and dynamic balance in pwMS appear scarcely correlated, although both worsen as disability increases. This implies that they should be separately assessed using specific tests to have a complete view of postural control performance in MS.
在多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)中,平衡评估对于估计跌倒风险、监测疾病进展以及验证康复治疗效果至关重要。临床工具和仪器技术可用于测试静态和动态平衡,但这些能力之间的关系仍不明确。了解这种联系对于合理规划测试的类型和数量非常重要。
106名pwMS患者(扩展残疾状态量表,EDSS 0 - 6.5)分为三个亚组(1类EDSS 0 - 1.5,2类EDSS 2 - 4和3类EDSS 4.5 - 6.5),42名健康对照者(HC)参与了该研究。所有人都接受了静态姿势描记法和使用可穿戴惯性传感器进行的仪器化定时起立行走测试(TUG)。对原始数据进行处理,以提取姿势摆动特征、TUG的总持续时间及其主要子阶段(即从坐到站、180°转身和从站到坐)。
发现2类和3类pwMS患者的所有摆动参数,以及TUG总持续时间和进行180°转身所需的时间,均显著高于HC和1类参与者。然而,摆动和TUG参数之间的相关性较差。当对pwMS患者进行分组时,发现所有摆动参数与TUG总持续时间之间存在小/中度相关性(范围为0.20 - 0.41)。
pwMS患者的静态和动态平衡似乎几乎没有相关性,尽管两者都会随着残疾程度的增加而恶化。这意味着应该使用特定测试分别评估它们,以便全面了解MS患者的姿势控制表现。