• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跖跗关节损伤的流行病学研究。

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY ON LISFRANC INJURIES.

作者信息

Sobrado Marcel Faraco, Saito Guilherme Honda, Sakaki Marcos Hideyo, Pontin Pedro Augusto, Santos Alexandre Leme Godoy Dos, Fernandes Túlio Diniz

机构信息

. Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Jan-Feb;25(1):44-47. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172501168995.

DOI:10.1590/1413-785220172501168995
PMID:28642650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5474402/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics of patients with Lisfranc injuries and their associated fractures

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis on 42 patients with Lisfranc injuries hospitalized at Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, between 2006 and 2010. Parameters on patient profile, risk factors, fracture characteristics, data on treatment and acute complications were analyzed

RESULTS

Analysis of 42 cases showed that in our sample, men were more affected than women, with a ratio of 4.25:1. The most frequent trauma mechanism was car accident, followed by motorcycle accident. The most frequent type of injury was isolated lesion type B of Quenu and Kuss classification, representing 50% of cases. The most common fracture on the sample was the second metatarsal bone, with 16 cases, followed by cuboid bone fracture. Among the 42 cases, 17% had exposed fractures and 33 patients presented other associated fractures. The mean time elapsed between the trauma and definitive treatment was 6.7 days, while the mean length of hospital stay was 13.8 days. Six patients presented acute postoperative complications

CONCLUSION

Lisfranc injuries are more common in men undergoing automobile trauma. The prevalence of associated fractures is a frequent finding and the hospital stay may be longstanding.

摘要

目的

分析Lisfranc损伤患者及其相关骨折的特征

方法

这是一项对2006年至2010年间在圣保罗大学医学院临床医院骨科与创伤研究所住院的42例Lisfranc损伤患者的回顾性分析。分析了患者资料、危险因素、骨折特征、治疗数据及急性并发症等参数。

结果

对42例病例的分析表明,在我们的样本中,男性比女性受影响更大,比例为4.25:1。最常见的创伤机制是车祸,其次是摩托车事故。最常见的损伤类型是Quenu和Kuss分类中的孤立B型损伤,占病例的50%。样本中最常见的骨折是第二跖骨骨折,有16例,其次是骰骨骨折。42例中,17%有开放性骨折,33例有其他相关骨折。创伤至确定性治疗的平均时间为6.7天,平均住院时间为13.8天。6例患者出现术后急性并发症。

结论

Lisfranc损伤在遭受汽车创伤的男性中更为常见。相关骨折的发生率很常见,且住院时间可能较长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/9c50c08266f9/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/e8e84c88e139/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/b0fc791d2bab/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/b97816b5c93e/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/a869b1532c95/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/9c50c08266f9/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/e8e84c88e139/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/b0fc791d2bab/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/b97816b5c93e/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/a869b1532c95/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdba/5474402/9c50c08266f9/1413-7852-aob-25-01-00044-gf5.jpg

相似文献

1
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY ON LISFRANC INJURIES.跖跗关节损伤的流行病学研究。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Jan-Feb;25(1):44-47. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172501168995.
2
[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.
3
Prevalence and patterns of foot injuries following motorcycle trauma.摩托车创伤后足部损伤的患病率及模式
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Feb;18(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200402000-00005.
4
Lisfranc joint injuries: trauma mechanisms and associated injuries.跖跗关节损伤:创伤机制及相关损伤
J Trauma. 1993 Jul;35(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199307000-00007.
5
Epidemiological study on talus fractures.距骨骨折的流行病学研究。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Aug 5;49(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2013.07.002. eCollection 2014 Jul-Aug.
6
Epidemiologic study of ankle fractures in a tertiary hospital.一家三级医院踝关节骨折的流行病学研究。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2014;22(2):90-3. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522014220200874.
7
Injury Characteristics of Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries Compared With High-Energy Injuries.低能量Lisfranc损伤与高能量损伤的损伤特征比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Sep;38(9):964-969. doi: 10.1177/1071100717709575. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
8
The effect of the Tscherne injury pattern on the outcome of operatively treated Lisfranc fracture dislocations.Tscherne 损伤分型对手术治疗的跖跗关节骨折脱位预后的影响。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep;19(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 11.
9
Anatomic predisposition to ligamentous Lisfranc injury: a matched case-control study.解剖学易感性与跖跗关节韧带损伤的关系:一项配对病例对照研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):2043-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01142.
10
Acute management of high-energy lisfranc injuries: A simple approach.高能Lisfranc损伤的急性处理:一种简单方法。
Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):420-424. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and management of adult Lisfranc injuries in the United States: a 10-year analysis of 21,964 cases.美国成人利氏损伤的流行病学与管理:对21964例病例的10年分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 21;145(1):421. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06042-0.
2
Biomechanical analysis of elastic fixation for lisfranc injuries with finite elements method.基于有限元法的Lisfranc损伤弹性固定生物力学分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11611-9.
3
Comparison of two surgical techniques for Lisfranc injuries; closed reduction and fixation versus primary partial arthrodesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Lisfranc injuries.利斯弗朗克损伤。
BMJ. 2013 Jul 23;347:f4561. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4561.
2
Fractures and dislocations of the midfoot: Lisfranc and Chopart injuries.中足骨折与脱位:Lisfranc损伤和Chopart损伤。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1325-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L00413.
3
[Effective analysis of open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of acute Lisfranc joint injury].切开复位内固定治疗急性Lisfranc关节损伤的疗效分析
两种手术技术治疗 Lisfranc 损伤的比较;闭合复位内固定与一期部分关节融合术。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):389-394. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.60869.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Nov;24(11):922-5.
4
Outcome of surgically treated Lisfranc injury: a review of 34 cases.手术治疗Lisfranc损伤的结果:34例病例回顾
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Nov;17(6):504-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.04809.
5
Epidemiology, imaging, and treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations revisited.重新探讨 Lisfranc 骨折脱位的流行病学、影像学表现和治疗。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Feb;41(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1131-5. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
6
The role of reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: a systematic review of the literature.Lisfranc 骨折脱位的复位与内固定治疗作用:文献系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1083-91. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1101-x. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
7
Making sense of lisfranc injuries.解读跖跗关节损伤
Foot Ankle Clin. 2008 Dec;13(4):695-704, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2008.07.001.
8
Primary open reduction and fixation compared with delayed corrective arthrodesis in the treatment of tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocation.在跗跖关节(Lisfranc)骨折脱位治疗中,一期切开复位内固定与延迟矫正关节融合术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Nov;90(11):1499-506. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20695.
9
Radiology corner. Answer to last month's radiology case and image: Subtle lisfranc injury: low energy midfoot sprain.
Mil Med. 2007 Sep;172(9):xii-xiii.
10
Practical management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes.运动员Lisfranc损伤的实际管理
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Jul;17(4):311-5. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31811ed0ba.