Larsson Christel, Drazic Marko, Nilsson Eddie, Vult von Steyern Per
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden.
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2015 Jul 16;1(1):35-42. doi: 10.3109/23337931.2015.1057825. eCollection 2015 Jan.
: The main aim of this study was to compare fracture load and fracture mode of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and metal-ceramic (MC) molar crowns using a modified test set-up to produce fractures similar to those seen , i.e. fractures of the veneering material rather than complete fractures. : 13 high-noble-alloy MC and 13 Y-TZP molar crowns veneered with porcelain were manufactured. The crowns were artificially aged before final load to fracture. Load was applied using a 7 mm diameter steel ball exerting force on the cusps with stresses directed toward the core-veneer interface. Fracture surface analysis was performed using light- and scanning electron microscopy. : The test design produced fractures of the veneering material rather than complete fractures. MC crowns withstood significantly ( > 0.001) higher loads (mean 2155 N) than Y-TZP (mean 1505 N) crowns, yet both endure loads sufficient for predictable clinical use. Fracture mode differed between MC and Y-TZP. MC crowns exhibited fractures involving the core-veneer interface but without core exposure. One Y-TZP crown suffered a complete fracture, all others except one displayed fractures of the veneering material involving the core-veneer interface with core exposure. : The test set-up produces fractures similar to those found and may be useful to evaluate the core-veneer interface of different material systems, both metals and ceramics. The study confirms suggestions from previous studies of a weaker core-veneer bond for Y-TZP compared to MC crowns.
本研究的主要目的是使用改良的测试装置比较氧化钇稳定四方多晶氧化锆(Y-TZP)和金属陶瓷(MC)磨牙冠的断裂载荷和断裂模式,以产生与实际所见类似的骨折,即饰面材料的骨折而非完全骨折。制作了13个高贵金属合金MC和13个瓷贴面的Y-TZP磨牙冠。在最终加载至断裂前对冠进行人工老化。使用直径7mm的钢球施加负载,应力指向核心-饰面界面,作用于牙尖。使用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜进行断口表面分析。该测试设计产生的是饰面材料的骨折而非完全骨折。MC冠承受的载荷(平均2155N)显著高于Y-TZP冠(平均1505N)(P<0.001),但两者承受的载荷均足以满足可预测的临床使用。MC和Y-TZP的断裂模式不同。MC冠的骨折涉及核心-饰面界面,但未暴露核心。一个Y-TZP冠发生了完全骨折,除一个外的所有其他冠均显示饰面材料的骨折涉及核心-饰面界面且暴露了核心。该测试装置产生的骨折与实际所见类似,可能有助于评估不同材料系统(包括金属和陶瓷)的核心-饰面界面。该研究证实了先前研究的建议,即与MC冠相比,Y-TZP的核心-饰面粘结较弱。