• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将MEG数据集在共同表征空间中进行受试者间对齐。

Inter-subject alignment of MEG datasets in a common representational space.

作者信息

Zhang Qiong, Borst Jelmer P, Kass Robert E, Anderson John R

机构信息

Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4287-4301. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23689. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.23689
PMID:28643879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6866831/
Abstract

Pooling neural imaging data across subjects requires aligning recordings from different subjects. In magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings, sensors across subjects are poorly correlated both because of differences in the exact location of the sensors, and structural and functional differences in the brains. It is possible to achieve alignment by assuming that the same regions of different brains correspond across subjects. However, this relies on both the assumption that brain anatomy and function are well correlated, and the strong assumptions that go into solving the under-determined inverse problem given the high-dimensional source space. In this article, we investigated an alternative method that bypasses source-localization. Instead, it analyzes the sensor recordings themselves and aligns their temporal signatures across subjects. We used a multivariate approach, multiset canonical correlation analysis (M-CCA), to transform individual subject data to a low-dimensional common representational space. We evaluated the robustness of this approach over a synthetic dataset, by examining the effect of different factors that add to the noise and individual differences in the data. On an MEG dataset, we demonstrated that M-CCA performs better than a method that assumes perfect sensor correspondence and a method that applies source localization. Last, we described how the standard M-CCA algorithm could be further improved with a regularization term that incorporates spatial sensor information. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4287-4301, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

跨受试者合并神经成像数据需要对来自不同受试者的记录进行对齐。在脑磁图(MEG)记录中,由于传感器的确切位置不同以及大脑的结构和功能差异,不同受试者之间的传感器相关性很差。通过假设不同大脑的相同区域在受试者之间相对应,可以实现对齐。然而,这既依赖于大脑解剖结构和功能具有良好相关性的假设,也依赖于在给定高维源空间的情况下解决欠定逆问题时所采用的强假设。在本文中,我们研究了一种绕过源定位的替代方法。相反,它分析传感器记录本身,并在受试者之间对齐其时间特征。我们使用了一种多变量方法,即多集典型相关分析(M-CCA),将个体受试者数据转换到一个低维公共表示空间。我们通过检查添加到数据中的不同噪声因素和个体差异的影响,在一个合成数据集上评估了这种方法的稳健性。在一个MEG数据集上,我们证明了M-CCA比假设传感器完全对应和应用源定位的方法表现更好。最后,我们描述了如何使用包含空间传感器信息的正则化项进一步改进标准的M-CCA算法。《人类大脑图谱》38:4287 - 4301,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司。

相似文献

1
Inter-subject alignment of MEG datasets in a common representational space.将MEG数据集在共同表征空间中进行受试者间对齐。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4287-4301. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23689. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Inter-individual single-trial classification of MEG data using M-CCA.基于 M-CCA 的脑磁图数据个体间单次试验分类。
Neuroimage. 2023 Jun;273:120079. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120079. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.用于脑磁图源成像的源空间独立成分分析
J Neural Eng. 2016 Feb;13(1):016005. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016005. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Multi-subject MEG/EEG source imaging with sparse multi-task regression.基于稀疏多任务回归的多模态脑磁图/脑电图源成像
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:116847. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116847. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.脑磁图(MEG)和脑电图(EEG)信号协方差估计和空间白化的自动模型选择。
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:328-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.040. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
Closely Spaced MEG Source Localization and Functional Connectivity Analysis Using a New Prewhitening Invariance of Noise Space Algorithm.使用噪声空间算法的新预白化不变性进行紧密间隔的脑磁图源定位和功能连接分析。
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:4890497. doi: 10.1155/2016/4890497. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
7
The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.MEG 源重建方法对源空间连接估计的影响:最小范数解和波束形成的比较。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.038. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.定位估计算法(LEA):一种基于监督先验的解决脑电/脑磁逆问题的方法。
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2003 Jul;18:536-47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_45.
9
Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)定位准确性的蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 May;16(1):47-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10024.
10
Wavelet-based localization of oscillatory sources from magnetoencephalography data.基于小波变换的脑磁图数据振荡源定位
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Aug;61(8):2350-64. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2189883. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural alignment during outgroup intervention predicts future change of affect towards outgroup.在外群体干预期间的神经对齐预测对外群体情感未来变化。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Apr 1;34(4). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae125.
2
A technical review of canonical correlation analysis for neuroscience applications.神经科学应用中的典型相关分析技术综述。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Sep;41(13):3807-3833. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25090. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
The integration of social and neural synchrony: a case for ecologically valid research using MEG neuroimaging.社会和神经同步的整合:使用 MEG 神经影像学进行生态有效性研究的案例。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):143-152. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa061.
4
The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.记忆过程的常见时间进程揭示。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1463-1474. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774526. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Properly Compensating for Head Movements During MEG Acquisition Across Different Age Groups.在不同年龄组的脑磁图(MEG)采集过程中正确补偿头部运动的重要性。
Brain Topogr. 2017 Mar;30(2):172-181. doi: 10.1007/s10548-016-0523-1. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Tracking cognitive processing stages with MEG: A spatio-temporal model of associative recognition in the brain.利用脑磁图追踪认知加工阶段:大脑中联想识别的时空模型。
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:416-430. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg's method.加工阶段的发现:斯滕伯格方法的扩展。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Oct;123(5):481-509. doi: 10.1037/rev0000030. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.MEG 和 EEG 数据处理的 MNE 软件。
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
5
Stages of processing in associative recognition: evidence from behavior, EEG, and classification.联想识别中的加工阶段:来自行为、脑电图和分类的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2151-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00457. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
6
Group Study of Simulated Driving fMRI Data by Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis.基于多集典型相关分析的模拟驾驶功能磁共振成像数据的群组研究
J Signal Process Syst. 2012 Jul 1;68(1):31-48. doi: 10.1007/s11265-010-0572-8.
7
Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG.用于脑磁图中头动补偿的在线和离线工具。
Neuroimage. 2013 Mar;68:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.047. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
8
Validation of head movement correction and spatiotemporal signal space separation in magnetoencephalography.脑磁图中头部运动校正和时空信号空间分离的验证。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Nov;123(11):2180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.080. Epub 2012 May 26.
9
FreeSurfer.FreeSurfer。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex.人类腹侧颞叶皮层表象空间的一种常见的高维模型。
Neuron. 2011 Oct 20;72(2):404-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.026.