Suppr超能文献

体外评价 Pro Seal 和 Opal Seal 预防釉质白斑的表面性能。

In vitro evaluation of surface properties of Pro Seal and Opal Seal in preventing white spot lesions.

机构信息

College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE, USA.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Jun;20 Suppl 1:134-138. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12181.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the surface properties of two commercially available sealants (Pro Seal (PS) and Opal Seal (OS)) in terms of fluoride(F) release, biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus and the ability to resist acid penetration.

SETTING

University of Nebraska Medical Center.

MATERIAL & METHODS: Discs of similar diameter and thickness were made from OS and PS. Discs were soaked in double-distilled water, and F released was measured with fluoride meter daily for 14 consecutive days, then at 21 and 28 days. Biofilm formation was evaluated with Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli grown on sealant discs using confocal microscopy. Extracted human teeth (n=8) with sealant-coated buccal surfaces and untreated lingual surfaces were exposed to 0.1M lactic acid(pH=4.5) to test the acid penetration. After 1-4 weeks of exposure, teeth were subjected to microhardness testing and SEM microscopy.

RESULTS

PS released significantly higher levels of F than OS. PS showed more S. mutans adherence than OS, whereas Lactobacillus did not show any differences in adherence. Both sealants protected enamel surfaces, showing statistically significant difference in the depth of acid penetration compared to their unsealed control sides.

CONCLUSION

F release was adequate to aid in remineralization, although clinically it would not likely aid in preventing demineralization as there was no prolonged release of F by both sealants tested. S. mutans adherence to OS surface was less compared to PS surface, which could be of relevance in biofilm formation and white spot lesions. Both sealants protected enamel surfaces from acid penetration.

摘要

目的

评估两种市售密封剂(Pro Seal(PS)和 Opal Seal(OS))的表面性能,包括氟(F)释放、变形链球菌和乳杆菌生物膜形成以及抗酸渗透能力。

设置

内布拉斯加大学医学中心。

材料和方法

从 OS 和 PS 中制作出具有相似直径和厚度的圆盘。将圆盘浸泡在双蒸水中,每天使用氟化物计测量 F 的释放量,连续 14 天,然后在第 21 天和第 28 天测量。使用共聚焦显微镜评估在密封剂圆盘上生长的变形链球菌和乳杆菌的生物膜形成。用密封剂涂覆颊面和未处理舌面的提取人牙(n=8)暴露于 0.1M 乳酸(pH=4.5)中,以测试酸渗透。暴露 1-4 周后,对牙齿进行显微硬度测试和 SEM 显微镜检查。

结果

PS 释放的 F 水平明显高于 OS。PS 显示出比 OS 更多的变形链球菌附着,而乳杆菌在附着方面没有差异。两种密封剂都保护了牙釉质表面,与未密封的对照组相比,酸渗透的深度有统计学显著差异。

结论

F 的释放足以有助于再矿化,尽管临床上不太可能有助于预防脱矿,因为两种测试的密封剂都没有持续释放 F。与 PS 表面相比,OS 表面的变形链球菌附着较少,这可能与生物膜形成和白垩斑有关。两种密封剂都能保护牙釉质表面免受酸渗透。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验