Provenzano Maria-Gisette-Arias, Santin Gabriela-Cristina, Rios Daniela, Moura Sandra-Kiss, Palma-Dibb Regina-Guenka, Lucietto Tuane-Mertz, Bowman Jay, Ramos Adilson-Luiz
DDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa - UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
DDS, MS, PhD, Associate Professor. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Dec 1;15(12):e991-e998. doi: 10.4317/jced.60630. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Orthodontic treatment makes the patient susceptible to the development of white spot lesions (WSL) due to the greater accumulation of bacterial plaque. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preventive effect of two resin materials on the incidence of these lesions in the region adjacent to the fixed bracket bonded under a WSL-treated area by two resin materials.
36 extracted human molars presenting natural WSL were included. They were randomly divided into 2 groups for intervention: IC (Infiltration resin Icon®) and PS (resin sealant Pro Seal ®). Braces were bonded just above the WSL. The enamel surface around the brace was treated by one of the tested materials, leaving another part to be control. The samples were submitted again to a cariogenic challenge. The exposed enamel non-treated area from booth groups comprised the control group (E). For morphological analysis, confocal images were taken at baseline, after treatment, and after pH cycling of each sample. Lesion depth were measured (µm) and compared to the enamel thickness to calculate a demineralization index. All groups were compared using the Kruskal Wallis test and Dunn's post-test.
PS group showed the lowest demineralization index (0.27 µm) when compared to the control area (0.39 µm) (<0.05). IC presented a slightly higher percentage of lesions when compared to PS, however, did not differ significantly from the control exposed area.
The resin sealant Pro Seal® had a positive protective effect under white spot environmental area and Icon® infiltrant, although showed some protection, did not statistically differ from controls. Dental Caries, Orthodontics, Dental Enamel, Sealants.
由于牙菌斑大量堆积,正畸治疗会使患者更易出现白斑病变(WSL)。本研究旨在评估两种树脂材料对在WSL治疗区域下方粘结的固定矫治器附近区域这些病变发生率的预防效果。
纳入36颗存在天然WSL的拔除人磨牙。将它们随机分为2组进行干预:IC组(渗透树脂Icon®)和PS组(树脂封闭剂Pro Seal®)。矫治器粘结在WSL正上方。矫治器周围的牙釉质表面用其中一种受试材料处理,另一个部分作为对照。样本再次接受致龋挑战。两组未处理的暴露牙釉质区域构成对照组(E)。为进行形态学分析,在基线、治疗后以及每个样本进行pH循环后拍摄共聚焦图像。测量病变深度(μm)并与牙釉质厚度比较以计算脱矿指数。所有组使用Kruskal Wallis检验和Dunn事后检验进行比较。
与对照区域(0.39μm)相比,PS组显示出最低的脱矿指数(0.27μm)(<0.05)。与PS组相比,IC组病变百分比略高,但与对照暴露区域无显著差异。
树脂封闭剂Pro Seal®在白斑环境区域具有积极的保护作用,Icon®渗透剂虽然有一定保护作用,但在统计学上与对照组无差异。龋齿、正畸、牙釉质、封闭剂。