Fourie Carina
Benjamin Rabinowitz Assistant Professor in Medical Ethics in the Department of Philosophy's Program on Values in Society at the University of Washington in Seattle, and an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Bioethics and Humanities.
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):578-584. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.nlit1-1706.
Moral distress, according to Andrew Jameton's highly influential definition, occurs when a nurse knows the morally correct action to take but is constrained in some way from taking this action. The definition of moral distress has been broadened, first, to include morally challenging situations that give rise to distress but which are not necessarily linked to nurses feeling constrained, such as those associated with moral uncertainty. Second, moral distress has been broadened so that it is not confined to the experiences of nurses. However, such a broadening of the concept does not mean that the kind of moral distress being experienced, or the role of the person experiencing it, is morally irrelevant. I argue that differentiating between categories of distress-e.g., constraint and uncertainty-and between groups of health professionals who might experience moral distress is potentially morally relevant and should influence the analysis, measurement, and amelioration of moral distress in the clinic.
根据安德鲁·贾梅顿极具影响力的定义,道德困扰是指护士知道应采取符合道德的正确行动,但却因某种方式而受到限制无法采取该行动。道德困扰的定义已得到扩展,首先,它包括那些引发困扰但不一定与护士感到受限相关的道德挑战性情况,比如与道德不确定性相关的情况。其次,道德困扰的范围已扩大,使其不再局限于护士的经历。然而,这种概念的扩展并不意味着所经历的道德困扰类型或经历者的角色在道德上无关紧要。我认为,区分困扰的类别(例如限制和不确定性)以及可能经历道德困扰的卫生专业人员群体在潜在的道德层面上是相关的,并且应该影响临床中对道德困扰的分析、测量和改善。