Aljabery Mohannad, Coetzee-Prinsloo Isabel, van der Wath Annatjie, Al-Hmaimat Nathira
Department of Nursing, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Oct 13;11(5):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.10.005. eCollection 2024 Nov.
This integrative review aimed to identify the common characteristics of moral distress in nursing and distinguish it from other types of distress by examining nurses' perspectives in the literature. These insights will help update existing tools and create new ones to capture moral distress better, guiding the development and implementation of strategies to support nurses in addressing this challenge.
Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method was employed to guide a systematic search for literature in three databases (EBSCO Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed). Additionally, two journals, and , were manually searched to reduce search bias. The included studies were primary resources published in English between 2018 and 2023, utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods to examine moral distress's characteristics, components, and definitions. All of identified studies were screened, extracted, and analyzed independently by two researchers.
Nineteen studies were included. The results were grouped into five themes shaping the main characteristics of moral distress: 1) experiencing a moral situation, with five ethically conflicted situations identified, including treatment plans, professional and personal moral values, team dynamics, complex contexts, clinical practices, and patient-centered care; 2) making a moral judgment, where nurses experience moral distress when they cannot act consistently with their values, ethical principles, and moral duties; 3) the presence of constraints, categorized at three levels: individual factors related to the nurse, patient, and patient's family; team factors related to the team or unit involved; and system factors, including institutional and policy elements; 4) moral wrongdoing, which occurs when nurses are unable to perform the right moral action; and 5) moral suffering, with studies showing that moral distress impacts physical, emotional, and psychological well-being.
The findings enhance the understanding of moral distress characteristics among nursing staff, highlighting the concept of the crescendo effect, which underscores the cumulative and escalating nature of unresolved moral distress, emphasizing the need to address moral conflicts proactively to prevent the erosion of moral integrity and professional satisfaction.
本整合性综述旨在通过审视文献中护士的观点,确定护理中道德困扰的共同特征,并将其与其他类型的困扰区分开来。这些见解将有助于更新现有工具并创建新工具,以更好地捕捉道德困扰,指导制定和实施策略来支持护士应对这一挑战。
采用惠特莫尔和克纳夫的整合性综述方法,指导在三个数据库(EBSCO Medline、CINAHL和PubMed)中系统检索文献。此外,还手动检索了两本期刊,以减少检索偏倚。纳入的研究为2018年至2023年间以英文发表的原始资料,采用定量、定性或混合方法来研究道德困扰的特征、组成部分和定义。所有识别出的研究均由两名研究人员独立筛选、提取和分析。
纳入了19项研究。结果分为五个主题,塑造了道德困扰的主要特征:1)经历道德情境,确定了五种存在伦理冲突的情境,包括治疗方案、专业和个人道德价值观、团队动态、复杂情境、临床实践以及以患者为中心的护理;2)做出道德判断,当护士无法按照自己的价值观、伦理原则和道德义务行事时,会经历道德困扰;3)存在限制因素,分为三个层面:与护士、患者及患者家属相关的个体因素;与所涉及的团队或科室相关的团队因素;以及系统因素,包括机构和政策要素;4)道德失当行为,当护士无法采取正确的道德行动时就会发生;5)道德痛苦,研究表明道德困扰会影响身体、情感和心理健康。
这些发现增进了对护理人员道德困扰特征的理解,突出了渐强效应的概念,该效应强调了未解决的道德困扰的累积和升级性质,强调需要积极解决道德冲突,以防止道德完整性和职业满意度受到侵蚀。