Marx Peter, Antal Peter, Bolgar Bence, Bagdy Gyorgy, Deakin Bill, Juhasz Gabriella
MTA-SE Neuropsychopharmacology and Neurochemistry Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Measurement and Information Systems, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 23;13(6):e1005487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005487. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Comorbidity patterns have become a major source of information to explore shared mechanisms of pathogenesis between disorders. In hypothesis-free exploration of comorbid conditions, disease-disease networks are usually identified by pairwise methods. However, interpretation of the results is hindered by several confounders. In particular a very large number of pairwise associations can arise indirectly through other comorbidity associations and they increase exponentially with the increasing breadth of the investigated diseases. To investigate and filter this effect, we computed and compared pairwise approaches with a systems-based method, which constructs a sparse Bayesian direct multimorbidity map (BDMM) by systematically eliminating disease-mediated comorbidity relations. Additionally, focusing on depression-related parts of the BDMM, we evaluated correspondence with results from logistic regression, text-mining and molecular-level measures for comorbidities such as genetic overlap and the interactome-based association score. We used a subset of the UK Biobank Resource, a cross-sectional dataset including 247 diseases and 117,392 participants who filled out a detailed questionnaire about mental health. The sparse comorbidity map confirmed that depressed patients frequently suffer from both psychiatric and somatic comorbid disorders. Notably, anxiety and obesity show strong and direct relationships with depression. The BDMM identified further directly co-morbid somatic disorders, e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, or migraine. Using the subnetwork of depression and metabolic disorders for functional analysis, the interactome-based system-level score showed the best agreement with the sparse disease network. This indicates that these epidemiologically strong disease-disease relations have improved correspondence with expected molecular-level mechanisms. The substantially fewer number of comorbidity relations in the BDMM compared to pairwise methods implies that biologically meaningful comorbid relations may be less frequent than earlier pairwise methods suggested. The computed interactive comprehensive multimorbidity views over the diseasome are available on the web at Co=MorNet: bioinformatics.mit.bme.hu/UKBNetworks.
共病模式已成为探索疾病间发病机制共享机制的主要信息来源。在对共病情况进行无假设探索时,疾病 - 疾病网络通常通过成对方法来识别。然而,结果的解释受到几个混杂因素的阻碍。特别是大量的成对关联可能通过其他共病关联间接产生,并且随着所研究疾病范围的扩大呈指数增加。为了研究和过滤这种效应,我们将成对方法与一种基于系统的方法进行了计算和比较,该方法通过系统地消除疾病介导的共病关系来构建稀疏贝叶斯直接多发病率图谱(BDMM)。此外,聚焦于BDMM中与抑郁症相关的部分,我们评估了其与逻辑回归、文本挖掘以及共病的分子水平测量结果(如基因重叠和基于相互作用组的关联分数)的对应关系。我们使用了英国生物银行资源的一个子集,这是一个横断面数据集,包括247种疾病和117392名填写了关于心理健康详细问卷的参与者。稀疏共病图谱证实,抑郁症患者经常患有精神和躯体共病障碍。值得注意的是,焦虑症和肥胖症与抑郁症表现出强烈的直接关系。BDMM还识别出了其他直接共病的躯体疾病,如肠易激综合征、纤维肌痛或偏头痛。利用抑郁症和代谢紊乱的子网进行功能分析,基于相互作用组的系统水平分数与稀疏疾病网络显示出最佳一致性。这表明这些在流行病学上较强的疾病 - 疾病关系与预期的分子水平机制具有更好的对应性。与成对方法相比,BDMM中共病关系的数量大幅减少,这意味着具有生物学意义的共病关系可能比早期成对方法所表明的频率更低。通过Co = MorNet网站(bioinformatics.mit.bme.hu/UKBNetworks)可以获取在疾病组上计算出的交互式综合多发病率视图。