Hill Shirley Y, Edenberg Howard J, Corvin Aiden, Thorgeirsson Thorgeir, Below Jennifer E, Goldman David, Leal Suzanne, Almasy Laura, Cox Nancy J, Daly Mark, Neale Benjamin, Vrieze Scott, Zoghbi Huda
Behavioral Genetics Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Genes Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;24(1):e70017. doi: 10.1111/gbb.70017.
The National Institute of Drug Abuse convened a panel of scientists with expertise in substance use disorders (SUD) and genetic methodologies primarily to determine the feasibility of performing whole genome sequencing utilizing existing pedigree collections with a high density of SUD and psychiatric disorders. A major focus was on determining if there had been any successes in identifying genetic variants for complex traits in family-based designs. Such information could provide assurance that whole genome sequencing might provide significant pay-offs particularly in the pursuit of rare variants and copy number variants. An important goal was to discuss and evaluate optimal strategies for studying genetic variants in human samples. Specific topics were (a) to consider whether a smaller number of cases typically available in family studies versus the larger number available in biobanks can reveal unique information; (b) to identify potential gaps in information available in biobank data that might be supplemented with family data; (c) to consider the optimal SUD phenotypic definitions (e.g., quantity of use, problem-oriented) and data collection instruments (self-report or clinician administered) that are both practical and efficient to collect, and likely to provide important insights concerning prevention, intervention, and medication development. Conclusions reached by the panel included optimism about the successes that have occurred in the existing family studies ascertained to include densely affected pedigrees. Evaluation of methodologies led, overall, to a panel consensus that steps should be taken to utilize biobank collection in conjunction with family-based investigations for optimal variant discovery.
美国国家药物滥用研究所召集了一个由物质使用障碍(SUD)和基因方法学领域的专家组成的小组,主要目的是确定利用现有的、患有高密度SUD和精神疾病的家系集合进行全基因组测序的可行性。一个主要重点是确定在基于家系的设计中识别复杂性状的基因变异方面是否取得了任何成功。此类信息可以确保全基因组测序可能会带来显著回报,特别是在寻找罕见变异和拷贝数变异方面。一个重要目标是讨论和评估在人类样本中研究基因变异的最佳策略。具体主题包括:(a)考虑家系研究中通常可用的病例数量较少,与生物样本库中可用的病例数量较多相比,是否能揭示独特信息;(b)确定生物样本库数据中可能需要家系数据补充的潜在信息空白;(c)考虑实用且高效收集的、可能为预防、干预和药物开发提供重要见解的最佳SUD表型定义(例如,使用量、问题导向型)和数据收集工具(自我报告或临床医生管理)。该小组得出的结论包括,对现有家系研究中取得的成功持乐观态度,这些研究已确定包括受影响程度密集的家系。总体而言,对方法的评估导致小组达成共识,即应采取措施将生物样本库收集与基于家系的调查结合起来,以实现最佳的变异发现。