Sung Paul S, Maxwell Michael J
Department of Physical Therapy, Central Michigan University, United States.
College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, United States.
J Biomech. 2017 Jul 5;59:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Although subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP) demonstrate altered trunk control, the kinematic and kinetic responses of the trunk have not been carefully investigated. This study was conducted to compare the standing time, spine range of motion (ROM), and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) based on visual condition between subjects with and without recurrent LBP during upright one leg standing. Sixty-three individuals participated in the study, including 34 control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP. The DPSI was a composite of the medio-lateral (MLSI), anterior-posterior (APSI), and vertical steadiness indices (VSI) on a force platform. The control group demonstrated longer standing time (s) during the eyes-open condition than the LBP group (26.82±6.03 vs. 19.87±9.36; t=2.96, p=0.01). Regarding spine ROM, visual condition was significantly different between groups (F=7.09, p=0.01) and demonstrated interactions with spine region and group (F=5.53, p=0.02). For the kinetic measures, there was a significant interaction between visual conditions and indices (F=25.30, p=0.001). In the LBP group, the DPSI was significantly correlated with the MLSI (r=0.59, p=0.002), APSI (r=0.44, p=0.03), and VSI (r=0.98, p=0.01) in the eyes-closed condition. Overall, the results of this study indicated that the LBP group decreased thorax and lumbar spine rotations during the eyes-closed condition. The LBP group also demonstrated positive correlations with the kinetic indices, enhancing dynamic postural steadiness in the eyes-closed condition in order to possibly avoid pain or further injury. This dynamic postural steadiness strategy is necessary to improve kinetic and kinematic chain reactions in the LBP group. This compensatory pattern supports the development of optimal postural correction strategies to prevent LBP recurrence and might represent a chain reaction to protect trunk control without visual input.
尽管复发性腰痛(LBP)患者表现出躯干控制能力改变,但尚未对躯干的运动学和动力学反应进行仔细研究。本研究旨在比较有和没有复发性LBP的受试者在单腿直立站立时基于视觉条件的站立时间、脊柱活动范围(ROM)和动态姿势稳定性指数(DPSI)。63名个体参与了该研究,包括34名对照受试者和29名复发性LBP受试者。DPSI是力平台上的内侧-外侧(MLSI)、前后(APSI)和垂直稳定性指数(VSI)的综合指标。对照组在睁眼条件下的站立时间(秒)比LBP组更长(26.82±6.03对19.87±9.36;t=2.96,p=0.01)。关于脊柱ROM,两组之间的视觉条件存在显著差异(F=7.09,p=0.01),并且显示出与脊柱区域和组的相互作用(F=5.53,p=0.02)。对于动力学测量,视觉条件和指数之间存在显著的相互作用(F=25.30,p=0.001)。在LBP组中,闭眼条件下DPSI与MLSI(r=0.59,p=0.002)、APSI(r=0.44,p=0.03)和VSI(r=0.98,p=0.01)显著相关。总体而言,本研究结果表明,LBP组在闭眼条件下胸部和腰椎的旋转减少。LBP组还与动力学指数呈正相关,在闭眼条件下增强动态姿势稳定性,以可能避免疼痛或进一步损伤。这种动态姿势稳定性策略对于改善LBP组的动力学和运动链反应是必要的。这种代偿模式支持开发最佳姿势矫正策略以防止LBP复发,并且可能代表一种在没有视觉输入的情况下保护躯干控制的连锁反应。