Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):411-423. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
In patients with advanced and metastatic urological cancers, clinical outcome may be improved by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
To systematically review relevant literature on efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with advanced and metastatic urothelial cell cancer (UCC), renal cell cancer (RCC), and prostate cancer.
Relevant databases, including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched up to March 16, 2017. A narrative review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed.
Six RCTs were included for the systematic review. In platinum-pretreated UCC, efficacy of pembrolizumab was superior to chemotherapy, with longer median overall survival (OS; 10.3 vs 7.4 mo), a higher objective response rate (ORR; 21.1% vs 11.4%, p=0.001), and a lower adverse event rate (60.9% vs 90.2%). Three RCTs assessed the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in advanced RCC. The median OS (25.0 vs 19.6 mo) and the ORR (25% vs 5%) were higher in patients treated with nivolumab compared with second-line everolimus. In all three studies, the safety profile of nivolumab was favorable. In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, two RCTs were identified, which did not show significant benefits for ipilimumab over placebo. In UCC and RCC, there was no conclusive association between programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor tissue and clinical outcome during pembrolizumab and nivolumab treatment, respectively.
In metastatic UCC and RCC, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have superior efficacy and safety to second-line chemotherapy and everolimus, respectively. No beneficial effect of ipilimumab was observed in prostate cancer patients. PD-L1 expression status is currently not suitable as a predictive marker for treatment outcome.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are able to reactivate the immune system against tumor cells. In second-line setting, pembrolizumab and nivolumab are safe and confer survival benefit in advanced urothelial cell and renal cell cancer, respectively.
在晚期和转移性泌尿系统癌症患者中,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)可改善临床结局。
系统综述ICI 治疗晚期和转移性尿路上皮细胞癌(UCC)、肾细胞癌(RCC)和前列腺癌患者的疗效和安全性的相关文献。
检索包括 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆在内的相关数据库,检索截至 2017 年 3 月 16 日。对随机临床试验(RCT)进行叙述性综述。
纳入 6 项 RCT 进行系统综述。在铂类预处理的 UCC 患者中,pembrolizumab 的疗效优于化疗,中位总生存期(OS)更长(10.3 比 7.4 个月),客观缓解率(ORR;21.1%比 11.4%,p=0.001)更高,不良反应发生率(60.9%比 90.2%)更低。3 项 RCT 评估了 nivolumab 在晚期 RCC 中的安全性和疗效。与二线依维莫司相比,nivolumab 治疗患者的中位 OS(25.0 比 19.6 个月)和 ORR(25%比 5%)更高。在所有 3 项研究中,nivolumab 的安全性良好。在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中,确定了 2 项 RCT,但并未显示 ipilimumab 优于安慰剂。在 UCC 和 RCC 中,pembrolizumab 和 nivolumab 治疗期间肿瘤组织中程序性死亡受体配体 1(PD-L1)表达与临床结局之间均无明确关联。
在转移性 UCC 和 RCC 中,pembrolizumab 和 nivolumab 分别作为二线化疗和依维莫司的治疗选择,具有更高的疗效和安全性。在前列腺癌患者中未观察到 ipilimumab 的有益作用。PD-L1 表达状态目前不适合作为治疗结果的预测标志物。
免疫检查点抑制剂能够使免疫系统重新攻击肿瘤细胞。在二线治疗中,pembrolizumab 和 nivolumab 在晚期尿路上皮细胞癌和肾细胞癌中是安全的,且均能带来生存获益。