Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Neurology Department, Paris, France; Clinical Investigation Centre, INSERM 1127, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Université Paris 06, Paris, France; Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) S1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Paris, France.
Department of Neurology, INSERM-Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1402, University of Poitiers, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Aug;16(8):610-619. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30160-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed to treat patients with severe Tourette's syndrome, and open-label trials and two small double-blind trials have tested DBS of the posterior and the anterior internal globus pallidus (aGPi). We aimed to specifically assess the efficacy of aGPi DBS for severe Tourette's syndrome.
In this randomised, double-blind, controlled trial, we recruited patients aged 18-60 years with severe and medically refractory Tourette's syndrome from eight hospitals specialised in movement disorders in France. Enrolled patients received surgery to implant bilateral electrodes for aGPi DBS; 3 months later they were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio with a block size of eight; computer-generated pairwise randomisation according to order of enrolment) to receive either active or sham stimulation for the subsequent 3 months in a double-blind fashion. All patients then received open-label active stimulation for the subsequent 6 months. Patients and clinicians assessing outcomes were masked to treatment allocation; an unmasked clinician was responsible for stimulation parameter programming, with intensity set below the side-effect threshold. The primary endpoint was difference in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) score between the beginning and end of the 3 month double-blind period, as assessed with a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test in all randomly allocated patients who received active or sham stimulation during the double-blind period. We assessed safety in all patients who were enrolled and received surgery for aGPi DBS. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00478842.
Between Dec 6, 2007, and Dec 13, 2012, we enrolled 19 patients. We randomly assigned 17 (89%) patients, with 16 completing blinded assessments (seven [44%] in the active stimulation group and nine [56%] in the sham stimulation group). We noted no significant difference in YGTSS score change between the beginning and the end of the 3 month double-blind period between groups (active group median YGTSS score 68·5 [IQR 34·0 to 83·5] at the beginning and 62·5 [51·5 to 72·0] at the end, median change 1·1% [IQR -23·9 to 38·1]; sham group 73·0 [69·0 to 79·0] and 79·0 [59·0 to 81·5], median change 0·0% [-10·6 to 4·8]; p=0·39). 15 serious adverse events (three in patients who withdrew before stimulation and six each in the active and sham stimulation groups) occurred in 13 patients (three who withdrew before randomisation, four in the active group, and six in the sham group), with infections in DBS hardware in four patients (two who withdrew before randomisation, one in the sham stimulation group, and one in the active stimulation group). Other serious adverse events included one electrode misplacement (active stimulation group), one episode of depressive signs (active stimulation group), and three episodes of increased tic severity and anxiety (two in the sham stimulation group and one in the active stimulation group).
3 months of aGPi DBS is insufficient to decrease tic severity for patients with Tourette's syndrome. Future research is needed to investigate the efficacy of aGPi DBS for patients over longer periods with optimal stimulation parameters and to identify potential predictors of the therapeutic response.
French Ministry of Health.
深部脑刺激(DBS)已被提议用于治疗严重的妥瑞氏症患者,并且已经进行了开放性试验和两项小型双盲试验来测试后内苍白球(aGPi)和前内苍白球的 DBS。我们旨在专门评估 aGPi DBS 治疗严重妥瑞氏症的疗效。
在这项随机、双盲、对照试验中,我们从法国的 8 家专门治疗运动障碍的医院招募了年龄在 18-60 岁之间、患有严重和药物难治性妥瑞氏症的患者。入组患者接受了双侧 aGPi DBS 电极植入手术;3 个月后,他们以 1:1 的比例(块大小为 8)随机分配(根据入组顺序进行计算机生成的成对随机分配)接受接下来 3 个月的主动或假刺激,以双盲方式进行;所有患者随后接受接下来 6 个月的开放标签主动刺激。评估结果的患者和临床医生对治疗分配进行了盲法评估;一名未盲的临床医生负责刺激参数编程,强度设定在副作用阈值以下。主要终点是在双盲期结束时与开始时相比,耶鲁总体抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS)评分的差异,所有在双盲期接受主动或假刺激的随机分配患者均采用 Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon 检验进行评估。我们评估了所有接受 aGPi DBS 手术并入组的患者的安全性。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00478842。
在 2007 年 12 月 6 日至 2012 年 12 月 13 日期间,我们招募了 19 名患者。我们随机分配了 17 名(89%)患者,其中 16 名完成了盲法评估(主动刺激组 7 名[44%],假刺激组 9 名[56%])。我们注意到两组在双盲期开始和结束时 YGTSS 评分的变化没有显著差异(主动组 YGTSS 评分中位数为 68.5[34.0 至 83.5],结束时为 62.5[51.5 至 72.0],中位数变化 1.1%[23.9 至 38.1];假刺激组为 73.0[69.0 至 79.0]和 79.0[59.0 至 81.5],中位数变化 0.0%[-10.6 至 4.8];p=0.39)。13 名患者(3 名在开始刺激前退出,主动组和假刺激组各 6 名)发生了 15 起严重不良事件(3 名在随机分组前退出,主动组 4 名,假刺激组 6 名),其中 4 名患者的 DBS 硬件感染(2 名在随机分组前退出,1 名在假刺激组,1 名在主动刺激组)。其他严重不良事件包括电极放置不当(主动刺激组)、抑郁症状发作(主动刺激组)和 3 起 Tic 严重程度和焦虑增加的发作(假刺激组 2 起,主动刺激组 1 起)。
对于妥瑞氏症患者,3 个月的 aGPi DBS 不足以降低 Tic 严重程度。需要进一步研究以确定 aGPi DBS 在更长时间内对患者的疗效以及优化刺激参数,并确定治疗反应的潜在预测因素。
法国卫生部。