Suppr超能文献

脑深部电刺激、重复经颅磁刺激和行为疗法治疗抽动秽语综合征的疗效比较:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析

Comparison of efficacy of deep brain stimulation, repeat transcranial magnetic stimulation, and behavioral therapy in Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lin Xiaofeng, Lin Fabin, Chen Huiyun, Weng Yanhong, Wen Junping, Ye Qinyong, Chen Chunmei, Cai Guoen

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience, Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.

Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2022 Oct 10;8(10):e10952. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10952. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tourette syndrome (TS) is an incurable neuropsychiatric disorder. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), repeat transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and behavioral therapy (BT) are all effective treatments. However, the comparison of therapeutic effect of these three therapies is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for randomized controlled studies (RCT). A network meta-analysis by R4.04 software according to Bayesian framework were performed. Results were meta-analyzed and network meta-analyzed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of DBS, rTMS and BT in TS patients.

RESULTS

A total of 18 randomized controlled studies with 661 participants were included. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) were utilized to evaluate the symptoms of TS. All three treatments improved the tic symptoms of TS [DBS 12.11 (95%CI 7.58-16.65); rTMS 4.96 (95%CI 1.01-10.93); andBT 11.72 (95%CI 10.42-13.01)]; and obsessive-compulsive symptom [DBS 4.9 (95%CI 1.13-8.67); rTMS 5.28 (95%CI 0.21-10.77); and BT 1.61 (95%CI 0.74-2.48)]. The cumulative probability results showed that DBS had the best effect on the improvement of tic symptoms, followed by BT; and rTMS was ranked last. However, in terms of improvement of obsessional symptoms, rTMS was ranked first, DBS was ranked second, and BT was ranked last. In addition, the meta regression analysis of YGTSS in DBS, rTMS and BT has significant difference (P = 0.05).

LIMITATION

Due to the lack of quantitative indicators, we did not perform a network meta-analysis of the side effects of the three treatments.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that DBS, rTMS, and BT are effective in TS. DBS causes the best improvement in tic symptoms, and rTMS is the most effective in improving the obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

摘要

背景

抽动秽语综合征(TS)是一种无法治愈的神经精神疾病。深部脑刺激(DBS)、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和行为疗法(BT)都是有效的治疗方法。然而,缺乏对这三种疗法治疗效果的比较。

方法

对随机对照研究(RCT)进行系统的文献检索。使用R4.04软件根据贝叶斯框架进行网络荟萃分析。对结果进行荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析,以评估和比较DBS、rTMS和BT对TS患者的疗效。

结果

共纳入18项随机对照研究,661名参与者。采用耶鲁全球抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS)和耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评估TS症状。所有三种治疗方法均改善了TS的抽动症状[DBS 12.11(95%CI 7.58-16.65);rTMS 4.96(95%CI 1.01-10.93);BT 11.72(95%CI 10.42-13.01)];以及强迫症状[DBS 4.9(95%CI 1.13-8.67);rTMS 5.28(95%CI 0.21-10.77);BT 1.61(95%CI 0.74-2.48)]。累积概率结果显示,DBS对改善抽动症状效果最佳,其次是BT;rTMS排名最后。然而,在改善强迫症状方面,rTMS排名第一,DBS排名第二,BT排名最后。此外,DBS、rTMS和BT中YGTSS的荟萃回归分析有显著差异(P = 0.05)。

局限性

由于缺乏定量指标,我们未对三种治疗方法的副作用进行网络荟萃分析。

结论

我们的研究表明,DBS、rTMS和BT对TS有效。DBS对抽动症状的改善效果最佳,rTMS对改善强迫症状最有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0eb/9587297/8d510d24cdf4/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验