Reply to Robinson et al.: Building the evidence base on the forest cover effects of community titling.
作者信息
Blackman Allen, Corral Leonardo, Lima Eirivelthon Santos, Asner Gregory P
机构信息
Resources for the Future, Washington, DC 20036;
Climate Change and Sustainable Development Sector, InterAmerican Development Bank, Washington, DC 20577.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):E5765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708942114. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Robinson et al.: Building the evidence base on the forest cover effects of community titling.对罗宾逊等人的回应：建立关于社区土地所有权森林覆盖效应的证据基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):E5765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708942114. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon.为原住民社区命名有助于保护秘鲁亚马孙地区的森林。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4123-4128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603290114. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Reply to Remy et al.: Local and global limitations to forest productivity as mediators of biogeochemical response to forest edge effects.回复雷米等人：森林生产力的局部和全球限制作为对森林边缘效应的生物地球化学响应的调节因素
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):E7033-E7034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712103114. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
4
Reply to Raposo do Amaral et al.: The "Atlantis Forest hypothesis" adds a new dimension to Atlantic Forest biogeography.对拉波索·多·阿马拉尔等人的回复：“亚特兰蒂斯森林假说”为大西洋森林生物地理学增添了新的维度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):E2099-100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602391113. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Reply to Schöngart et al.: Forest resilience variation across Amazonian floodplains.对舍恩加特等人的回应：亚马逊河漫滩森林恢复力的变化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 10;114(41):E8552-E8554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714595114. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring.20世纪90年代热带森林覆盖变化及未来监测选项
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):373-84. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1590.
7
Inconvenient realities and the path toward science-based forest restoration policies: A reply to Veldman et al.
Am J Bot. 2017 May;104(5):652-653. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700143. Epub 2017 May 19.
8
Woody lianas increase in dominance and maintain compositional integrity across an Amazonian dam-induced fragmented landscape.木质藤本植物在整个亚马逊大坝引发的破碎景观中占据主导地位，并保持着组成完整性。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0185527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185527. eCollection 2017.
9
Reply to Price et al.: An inconvenient truth about the long-term forest change in western Canada: Competition is the primary driving force.对普莱斯等人的回应：关于加拿大西部长期森林变化的一个残酷事实：竞争是主要驱动力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 11;112(32):E4341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509592112. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Response to Comment on "The extent of forest in dryland biomes".对“旱地生物群系森林的范围”的评论的回应。
Science. 2017 Nov 17;358(6365):881. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2079.
本文引用的文献
1
Community land titles alone will not protect forests.仅社区土地所有权并不能保护森林。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):E5764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707787114. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon.为原住民社区命名有助于保护秘鲁亚马孙地区的森林。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4123-4128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603290114. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Zotero 插件