对“旱地生物群系森林的范围”的评论的回应。

Response to Comment on "The extent of forest in dryland biomes".

机构信息

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Vialle delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.

Landscape Ecology and Plant Production Systems Unit, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP264-2, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

Science. 2017 Nov 17;358(6365):881. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2079.

DOI:10.1126/science.aao2079

PMID:29146804

Abstract

Griffith do not question the quality of our analysis, but they question our results with respect to the definition of forest we employed. In our response, we explain why the differences we report result from a difference of technique and not of definition, and how anyone can adapt-as we did-our data set to any forest definition and tree cover threshold of interest.

摘要

格里菲斯并未质疑我们分析的质量，但他们对我们使用的森林定义的结果提出了质疑。在我们的回应中，我们解释了为什么我们报告的差异是由于技术上的差异，而不是定义上的差异，以及任何人如何像我们一样——将我们的数据集适用于任何感兴趣的森林定义和树木覆盖阈值。