• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时城市弹出式公园对身体活动和其他个人及社区层面结果的影响。

Impacts of a Temporary Urban Pop-Up Park on Physical Activity and Other Individual- and Community-Level Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health, Austin Campus, 1616 Guadalupe St, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2017 Aug;94(4):470-481. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0167-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-017-0167-9
PMID:28646369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5533666/
Abstract

Physical inactivity is a known risk factor for obesity and a number of chronic diseases. Modifying the physical features of neighborhoods to provide residents with equitable and convenient access to spaces for physical activity (PA) is a promising strategy for promoting PA. Public urban recreation spaces (e.g., parks) play an important role in promoting PA and are potentially an important neighborhood element for optimizing social capital and liveability in cities. Most studies examining the effects of park availability and use on PA have focused on traditional, permanent parks. The aims of this study were to (1) document patterns of park use and park-based PA at a temporary urban pop-up park implemented in the downtown business district of Los Altos, California during July-August 2013 and May-June 2014, (2) identify factors associated with park-based PA in 2014, and (3) examine the effects of the 2014 pop-up park on additional outcomes of potential benefit for park users and the Los Altos community at large. Park use remained high during most hours of the day in 2013 and 2014. Although the park attracted a multigenerational group of users, children and adolescents were most likely to engage in walking or more vigorous PA at the park. Park presence was significantly associated with potentially beneficial changes in time-allocation patterns among users, including a reduction in screen-time and an increase in overall park-time and time spent outdoors. Park implementation resulted in notable use among people who would otherwise not be spending time at a park (85% of surveyed users would not be spending time at any other park if the pop-up park was not there-2014 data analysis). Our results (significantly higher odds of spending time in downtown Los Altos due to park presence) suggest that urban pop-up parks may also have broader community benefits, such as attracting people to visit downtown business districts. Pending larger, confirmatory studies, our results suggest that temporary urban pop-up parks may contribute to solving the limited access to public physical activity recreation spaces many urban residents face.

摘要

身体活动不足是肥胖和许多慢性疾病的已知危险因素。改变社区的物理特征,为居民提供公平和方便的机会,让他们在这些地方进行身体活动(PA),这是促进 PA 的一个很有前途的策略。公共城市娱乐空间(例如公园)在促进 PA 方面发挥着重要作用,并且可能是优化城市社会资本和宜居性的重要社区要素。大多数研究都集中在研究公园的可用性和使用对 PA 的影响,这些研究主要集中在传统的永久性公园上。本研究的目的是:(1)记录 2013 年 7 月至 8 月和 2014 年 5 月至 6 月在加利福尼亚州洛斯阿尔托斯市中心商业区设立的临时城市弹出式公园的使用和基于公园的 PA 模式;(2)确定与 2014 年基于公园的 PA 相关的因素;(3)检验 2014 年弹出式公园对公园使用者和整个洛斯阿尔托斯社区的其他潜在利益结果的影响。2013 年和 2014 年,该公园在一天中的大部分时间都保持着较高的使用率。尽管该公园吸引了多个年龄段的使用者,但儿童和青少年在公园里最有可能进行散步或更剧烈的 PA。公园的存在与使用者时间分配模式的潜在有益变化显著相关,包括减少屏幕时间,增加整体公园时间和户外活动时间。公园的实施使得那些原本不会在公园里度过时间的人(如果没有弹出式公园,2014 年数据分析中有 85%的被调查用户不会在任何其他公园度过时间)显著地使用了公园。我们的研究结果(由于公园的存在,在洛杉矶市中心逗留的可能性显著增加)表明,城市弹出式公园可能还有更广泛的社区效益,例如吸引人们光顾市中心商业区。在更大规模的、确证性研究进行之前,我们的研究结果表明,临时城市弹出式公园可能有助于解决许多城市居民面临的公共体育活动娱乐空间有限的问题。

相似文献

1
Impacts of a Temporary Urban Pop-Up Park on Physical Activity and Other Individual- and Community-Level Outcomes.临时城市弹出式公园对身体活动和其他个人及社区层面结果的影响。
J Urban Health. 2017 Aug;94(4):470-481. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0167-9.
2
A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits.一项混合方法研究,旨在为弹出式公园的实施和扩展提供经济、行为和社会效益方面的信息。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):529-542. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00434-w.
3
Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study.积极利用公园作为城市资产促进身体活动:一项混合方法研究。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102660. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102660. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Social and environmental determinants of physical activity in urban parks: Testing a neighborhood disorder model.城市公园中身体活动的社会和环境决定因素:检验邻里失序模型。
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.美国邻里公园使用与两年内的身体活动:国家邻里公园研究。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
Use of a public park for physical activity in the Caribbean: evidence from a mixed methods study in Jamaica.在加勒比地区,利用公共公园进行身体活动:来自牙买加混合方法研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7247-6.
7
Contributions of Neighborhood Parks to Physical Activity in High-Poverty Urban Neighborhoods.邻里公园对贫困城市社区居民身体活动的贡献。
J Urban Health. 2018 Dec;95(6):881-887. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0320-0.
8
Gender Disparities in Park Use and Physical Activity among Residents of High-Poverty Neighborhoods in Los Angeles.洛杉矶高贫困社区居民的公园使用和身体活动中的性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Associations of neighborhood characteristics with active park use: an observational study in two cities in the USA and Belgium.社区特征与积极使用公园之间的关联:在美国和比利时两个城市的观察性研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2013 May 7;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-26.
10
Positive HABITATS for physical activity: Examining use of parks and its contribution to physical activity levels in mid-to older-aged adults.促进身体活动的积极环境:考察公园的使用情况及其对中老年人群身体活动水平的贡献。
Health Place. 2020 May;63:102308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102308. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods.纽约市低收入社区全市公园翻新前后的公园使用模式与公园满意度
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07264-3.
2
Exploring the Relationship between Built Environment Attributes and Physical Activity in Lower-Income Aging Adults: Preliminary Insights from a Multi-Level Trial.探索低收入老年人群体中建筑环境属性与身体活动之间的关系:一项多层次试验的初步观察结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 9;21(5):607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050607.
3
Harnessing Citizen Science to Assess and Improve Utilization of Metropolitan Parks: the Park Activity, Recreation, and Community Study (PARCS) in St. Louis, MO.利用公民科学评估和改善城市公园的使用情况:密苏里州圣路易斯市的公园活动、娱乐与社区研究(PARCS)
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2021 Dec 10;1(4):198-215. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.基于公园的干预措施对健康相关结果的影响:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106528. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106528. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits.一项混合方法研究,旨在为弹出式公园的实施和扩展提供经济、行为和社会效益方面的信息。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):529-542. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00434-w.
6
Use of SOPARC to assess physical activity in parks: do race/ethnicity, contextual conditions, and settings of the target area, affect reliability?使用SOPARC评估公园中的身体活动:种族/民族、目标区域的环境条件和场所会影响其可靠性吗?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):1730. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8107-0.
7
Systematic review and meta-analyses of lead (Pb) concentrations in environmental media (soil, dust, water, food, and air) reported in the United States from 1996 to 2016.对 1996 年至 2016 年美国环境介质(土壤、灰尘、水、食物和空气)中铅(Pb)浓度的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133489. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.295. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Translating Urban Walkability Initiatives for Older Adults in Rural and Under-Resourced Communities.为农村和资源匮乏社区的老年人推动城市步行友好计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;16(17):3041. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173041.
9
Perceptions of Nature and Access to Green Space in Four Urban Neighborhoods.四个城市社区中对自然的认知和对绿色空间的可达性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):2313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132313.
10
Healthy shopper? Blood pressure testing in a shopping centre Pop-Up in England.健康购物者?在英国购物中心的 Pop-Up 进行血压测试。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6370-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Park Conditions and Features on Park Visitation and Physical Activity.公园条件与特色对公园游览及身体活动的作用
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S178-S187. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s178.
2
Assessing the effect of physical activity classes in public spaces on leisure-time physical activity: "Al Ritmo de las Comunidades" A natural experiment in Bogota, Colombia.评估公共空间中体育活动课程对闲暇时间体育活动的影响:哥伦比亚波哥大的“社区节奏”自然实验。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S51-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
Context Matters: Systematic Observation of Place-Based Physical Activity.背景很重要:基于场所的体育活动的系统观察
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Dec;87(4):334-341. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1234302. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities.利用科学指导城市规划政策和实践:如何实现健康可持续的未来城市。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2936-2947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30068-X. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Healthier neighbourhoods through healthier parks.通过更健康的公园打造更健康的社区。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2850-2851. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31579-3. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Reclaiming the streets for people: Insights from Ciclovías Recreativas in Latin America.为人民夺回街道:拉丁美洲休闲车道的启示。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S34-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.在全球范围内扩大身体活动干预措施:采取更大规模、更明智的方法促使人们动起来。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1337-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium.四年来体育锻炼的进展。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1325-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.体力活动不足的经济负担:主要非传染性疾病的全球分析。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.首项关于社区公园的全国性研究:对身体活动的影响
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 May 18.