RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106528. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106528. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Increasing use of parks for physical activity has been proposed for improving population health, including mental health. Interventions that aim to increase park use and park-based physical activity include place-based interventions (e.g., park renovations) and person-based interventions (e.g., park-based walking or exercise classes). Using adapted methods from the Community Guide, a systematic review (search period through September 2019) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of park-based interventions among adults. The primary outcomes of interest were health-related, including physical and mental health and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Twenty-seven studies that met review criteria were analyzed in 2019 and 2020. Seven person-based studies included generally small samples of specific populations and interventions involved mostly exercise programming in parks; all but one had an average quality rating as "high" and all had at least one statistically significant outcome. Of the 20 place-based interventions, 7 involved only 1 or 2 parks; however, 7 involved from 9 to 78 parks. Types of interventions were predominantly park renovations; only 5 involved park-based exercise programming. Most of the renovations were associated with increased park-level use and physical activity, however among those implementing programming, park-level effects were more modest. Less than half of the place-based intervention studies had an average quality rating of "high." The study of parks as sites for physical activity interventions is nascent. Hybrid methods that combine placed-based evaluations and cohort studies could inform how to best optimize policy, programming, design and management to promote health and well-being.
越来越多的人提议利用公园进行体育活动,以改善包括心理健康在内的人口健康。旨在增加公园使用和基于公园的体育活动的干预措施包括基于场所的干预措施(例如,公园翻新)和基于个人的干预措施(例如,基于公园的散步或锻炼课程)。使用社区指南中的改编方法,对 2019 年 9 月之前进行的系统评价进行了评估,以评估基于公园的干预措施对成年人的有效性。主要的健康相关结果包括身体和心理健康以及中等到剧烈的身体活动。2019 年和 2020 年分析了符合审查标准的 27 项研究。七项基于个人的研究包括特定人群的一般小样本和干预措施主要涉及公园内的运动方案;除一项外,所有研究的平均质量评分均为“高”,且所有研究均至少有一个具有统计学意义的结果。在 20 项基于场所的干预措施中,有 7 项仅涉及 1 或 2 个公园;然而,有 7 项涉及 9 至 78 个公园。干预措施的类型主要是公园翻新;只有 5 项涉及基于公园的运动方案。大多数翻新工程都与公园使用和身体活动的增加有关,但在实施方案的那些中,公园层面的效果更为温和。不到一半的基于场所的干预研究的平均质量评分为“高”。公园作为身体活动干预场所的研究尚处于起步阶段。将基于场所的评估和队列研究相结合的混合方法可以为如何最佳优化政策、方案、设计和管理以促进健康和福祉提供信息。