Greiner Thomas M
Department of Health Professions, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601.
Clin Anat. 2017 Oct;30(7):894-900. doi: 10.1002/ca.22948. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Most textbooks describe the bifid spinous process as a shape associated with the typical cervical vertebra. Somewhere later they may acknowledge that cervical vertebrae are not always bifid, and that its appearance may be asymmetric. A high incidence of bifid cervical spinous processes may be a human characteristic, but because of known racial/geographic variation it may not be a very good one. Rarely can one find a satisfactory explanation of the functional or developmental basis for this shape variation. This article explores the distinctive shape of the cervical spinous process. Analysis is based upon the spinous processes of the third through seventh cervical vertebrae from fifty individuals. Shape differences were evaluated using the techniques of geometric morphometrics. Statistical comparisons were based upon 1000 permutations of a MANOVA based analysis. Significant shape differences were identified among the cervical vertebrae. However, post hoc analysis failed to identify significant differences between the C3 and C4 and between the C4 and C5 spinous process shapes. Primary shape differences were due to the depth of the bifid separation and the length of the process. Vertebrae with shorter spinous processes tended to display a more pronounced bifid condition. Combined observations from this and several other investigations suggest that a combination of variation in the spinalis cervicis muscle and behavioral patterns associated with cervical load may provide the best explanation for the shape variation in the cervical spinous process. Clin. Anat. 30:894-900, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
大多数教科书将分叉棘突描述为与典型颈椎相关的一种形态。在稍后的某处,它们可能会承认颈椎并不总是分叉的,而且其外观可能不对称。颈椎分叉棘突的高发生率可能是人类的一个特征,但由于已知的种族/地理差异,它可能并不是一个很好的特征。很少能找到关于这种形态变异的功能或发育基础的令人满意的解释。本文探讨了颈椎棘突的独特形态。分析基于50个个体第三至第七颈椎的棘突。使用几何形态计量学技术评估形态差异。统计比较基于基于多变量方差分析(MANOVA)的1000次排列分析。在颈椎之间发现了显著的形态差异。然而,事后分析未能确定C3和C4之间以及C4和C5棘突形态之间的显著差异。主要的形态差异在于分叉分离的深度和棘突的长度。棘突较短的椎骨往往表现出更明显的分叉状态。结合本研究和其他几项研究的观察结果表明,颈棘肌的变异与颈椎负荷相关的行为模式相结合,可能为颈椎棘突的形态变异提供最佳解释。《临床解剖学》2017年第30卷:894 - 900页。© 2017威利期刊公司。