Suppr超能文献

用于检测柔膜菌纲微生物的不同核酸扩增检测法的比较

Comparison of different NAT assays for the detection of microorganisms belonging to the class Mollicutes.

作者信息

Vega-Orellana O, Poveda J B, Rosales R S, Bradbury J M, Poveda C G, Mederos-Iriarte L E, Tavío M M, Ramírez A S

机构信息

Unidad de Epidemiología y Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, C/Trasmontaña s/n, 35413, Arucas, Gran Canaria, Spain.

University of Liverpool, School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2017 Jun 24;13(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1116-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mollicutes detection can be cumbersome due to their slow growth in vitro. For this reason, the use of DNA based on generic molecular tests represents an alternative for rapid, sensitive and specific detection of these microorganism. For this reason, six previously described nucleic acid testing assays were compared to evaluate their ability to detect microorganisms belonging to the class Mollicutes.

METHODS

A panel of 61 mollicutes, including representatives from the Mycoplasma, Acholeplasma, Mesoplasma, Spiroplasma and Ureaplasma genus, were selected to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these assays. A total of 21 non-mollicutes, including closely related non-mollicutes species, were used to evaluate specificity. Limits of detection were calculated to determine the analytical sensitivity of the assays. The two best performing assays were subsequently adapted into real-time PCR format, followed by melting curve analysis.

RESULTS

Both assays performed satisfactorily, with a 100% specificity described for both assays. The detection limits were found to be between 10 and 10 dilutions, equivalent to 15 to 150 genome copies approximately. Based on our work, both van Kuppeveld and Botes real-time PCR assays were found to be the best performing tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, Botes real-time PCR assay could detect phytoplasmas as well.

CONCLUSIONS

These assays can be very useful for the rapid, specific and sensitive screening cell line contaminants, clinical samples as well as detecting non-culturable, unknown species of mollicutes or mollicutes whose growth is slow or difficult.

摘要

背景

由于支原体在体外生长缓慢,其检测可能会很麻烦。因此,基于通用分子检测的DNA检测方法为快速、灵敏且特异检测这些微生物提供了一种替代方案。为此,对六种先前描述的核酸检测方法进行了比较,以评估它们检测支原体纲微生物的能力。

方法

选择一组61种支原体,包括来自支原体属、无胆甾原体属、中温支原体属、螺原体属和脲原体属的代表,以评估这些检测方法的敏感性和特异性。总共使用了21种非支原体,包括密切相关的非支原体物种,来评估特异性。计算检测限以确定检测方法的分析灵敏度。随后将两种性能最佳的检测方法改编为实时荧光定量PCR形式,然后进行熔解曲线分析。

结果

两种检测方法均表现良好,两种方法的特异性均为100%。检测限在10到10倍稀释之间,大约相当于15到150个基因组拷贝。基于我们的工作,发现范·库佩费尔德和博特斯实时荧光定量PCR检测方法在灵敏度和特异性方面是性能最佳的检测方法。此外,博特斯实时荧光定量PCR检测方法也可以检测植原体。

结论

这些检测方法对于快速、特异且灵敏地筛选细胞系污染物、临床样本以及检测不可培养的未知支原体物种或生长缓慢或困难 的支原体非常有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2618/5483278/e541a82b99c0/12917_2017_1116_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验