Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
University of Toronto, Canada.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;56(7):602-609.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
Methylphenidate has prominent effects in the dopamine-rich striatum that are absent for the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor atomoxetine. This study tested whether baseline striatal activation would predict differential response to the two medications in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
A total of 36 youth with ADHD performed a Go/No-Go test during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and were treated with methylphenidate and atomoxetine using a randomized cross-over design. Whole-brain task-related activation was regressed on clinical response.
Task-related activation in right caudate nucleus was predicted by an interaction of clinical responses to methylphenidate and atomoxetine (F = 17.00; p < .001). Elevated caudate activation was associated with robust improvement for methylphenidate and little improvement for atomoxetine. The rate of robust response was higher for methylphenidate than for atomoxetine in youth with high (94.4% vs. 38.8%; p = .003; number needed to treat = 2, 95% CI = 1.31-3.73) but not low (33.3% vs. 50.0%; p = .375) caudate activation. Furthermore, response to atomoxetine predicted motor cortex activation (F = 14.99; p < .001).
Enhanced caudate activation for response inhibition may be a candidate biomarker of superior response to methylphenidate over atomoxetine in youth with ADHD, purportedly reflecting the dopaminergic effects of methylphenidate but not atomoxetine in the striatum, whereas motor cortex activation may predict response to atomoxetine. These data do not yet translate directly to the clinical setting, but the approach is potentially important for informing future research and illustrates that it may be possible to predict differential treatment response using a biomarker-driven approach.
Stimulant Versus Nonstimulant Medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00183391.
哌甲酯对富含多巴胺的纹状体有显著作用,而选择性去甲肾上腺素转运体抑制剂托莫西汀则没有。本研究测试了基线纹状体激活是否可以预测患有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的年轻人对这两种药物的不同反应。
共有 36 名患有 ADHD 的年轻人在基线时进行了功能磁共振成像的 Go/No-Go 测试,并使用随机交叉设计接受了哌甲酯和托莫西汀的治疗。全脑任务相关激活与临床反应进行回归。
右侧尾状核的任务相关激活可由哌甲酯和托莫西汀的临床反应的相互作用预测(F=17.00;p<0.001)。纹状体激活升高与哌甲酯的显著改善和托莫西汀的改善较少有关。在高(94.4%对 38.8%;p=0.003;需要治疗的人数=2,95%置信区间=1.31-3.73)而非低(33.3%对 50.0%;p=0.375)尾状核激活的年轻人中,哌甲酯的反应率高于托莫西汀。此外,托莫西汀的反应预测了运动皮层的激活(F=14.99;p<0.001)。
反应抑制的尾状核激活增强可能是 ADHD 青少年对哌甲酯反应优于托莫西汀的候选生物标志物,据称反映了哌甲酯而非托莫西汀在纹状体中的多巴胺能作用,而运动皮层的激活可能预测托莫西汀的反应。这些数据尚未直接转化为临床环境,但这种方法对于为未来的研究提供信息可能很重要,并表明使用基于生物标志物的方法预测治疗反应是有可能的。
儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的兴奋剂与非兴奋剂药物;https://clinicaltrials.gov/;NCT00183391。