Section of Epidemiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 270, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Clinica Alpina SA, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Buorna, 7550 Scuol, Switzerland.
Clinica Alpina SA, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Buorna, 7550 Scuol, Switzerland.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Sep;100(9):7419-7426. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12446. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Bovine mastitis is an important disease in the dairy industry, causing economic losses as a result of withheld milk and treatment costs. Several studies have suggested milk amyloid A (MAA) as a promising biomarker in the diagnosis of mastitis. In the absence of a gold standard for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis, we estimated the diagnostic test accuracy of a commercial MAA-ELISA, somatic cell count (SCC), and bacteriological culture using Bayesian latent class modeling. We divided intramammary infections into 2 classes: those caused by major pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, streptococci, and lacto-/enterococci) and those caused by all pathogens (major pathogens plus Corynebacterium bovis, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Bacillus spp., Streptomyces spp.). We applied the 3 diagnostic tests to all samples. Of 433 composite milk samples included in this study, 275 (63.5%) contained at least 1 colony of any bacterial species; of those, 56 contained major pathogens and 219 contained minor pathogens. The remaining 158 samples (36.5%) were sterile. We determined 2 different thresholds for the MAA-ELISA using Bayesian latent class modeling: 3.9 µg/mL to detect mastitis caused by major pathogens and 1.6 µg/mL to detect mastitis caused by all pathogens. The optimal SCC threshold for identification of subclinical mastitis was 150,000 cells/mL; this threshold led to higher specificity (Sp) than 100,000 cells/mL. Test accuracy for major-pathogen intramammary infections was as follows: SCC, sensitivity (Se) 92.6% and Sp 72.9%; MAA-ELISA, Se 81.4% and Sp 93.4%; bacteriological culture, Se 23.8% and Sp 95.2%. Test accuracy for all-pathogen intramammary infections was as follows: SCC, sensitivity 90.3% and Sp 71.8%; MAA-ELISA, Se 88.0% and Sp 65.2%; bacteriological culture, Se 83.8% and Sp 54.8%. We suggest the use of SCC and MAA-ELISA as a combined screening procedure for situations such as a Staphylococcus aureus control program. With Bayesian latent class analysis, we were able to identify a more differentiated use of the 3 diagnostic tools. The MAA-ELISA is a valuable addition to existing tools for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis.
奶牛乳腺炎是奶牛养殖业中的一种重要疾病,会导致产奶量下降和治疗费用增加等经济损失。有几项研究表明,牛奶淀粉样蛋白 A(MAA)作为乳腺炎诊断的一种有前途的生物标志物。在缺乏亚临床乳腺炎诊断的金标准的情况下,我们使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型估计了商业 MAA-ELISA、体细胞计数(SCC)和细菌培养的诊断测试准确性。我们将乳腺内感染分为 2 类:由主要病原体(如大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、链球菌和乳链球菌/肠球菌)引起的感染和由所有病原体(主要病原体加上牛棒状杆菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、芽孢杆菌属、链霉菌属)引起的感染。我们将这 3 种诊断检测应用于所有样本。在本研究的 433 个复合牛奶样本中,275 个(63.5%)样本中至少含有 1 种细菌菌落;其中 56 个样本含有主要病原体,219 个样本含有次要病原体。其余 158 个样本(36.5%)为无菌样本。我们使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型确定了 MAA-ELISA 的 2 个不同阈值:3.9 µg/mL 用于检测由主要病原体引起的乳腺炎,1.6 µg/mL 用于检测由所有病原体引起的乳腺炎。用于识别亚临床乳腺炎的最佳 SCC 阈值为 150,000 个细胞/mL;该阈值比 100,000 个细胞/mL 具有更高的特异性(Sp)。主要病原体引起的乳腺内感染的检测准确性如下:SCC,敏感性(Se)为 92.6%,特异性(Sp)为 72.9%;MAA-ELISA,Se 为 81.4%,Sp 为 93.4%;细菌培养,Se 为 23.8%,Sp 为 95.2%。所有病原体引起的乳腺内感染的检测准确性如下:SCC,Se 为 90.3%,Sp 为 71.8%;MAA-ELISA,Se 为 88.0%,Sp 为 65.2%;细菌培养,Se 为 83.8%,Sp 为 54.8%。我们建议将 SCC 和 MAA-ELISA 用作金黄色葡萄球菌控制计划等情况下的联合筛选程序。通过贝叶斯潜在类别分析,我们能够识别出这 3 种诊断工具的更具差异化的用途。MAA-ELISA 是一种有价值的补充工具,可用于诊断亚临床乳腺炎。