Chen Jing, Valsecchi Matteo, Gegenfurtner Karl R
Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35394 Gießen, Germany.
Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35394 Gießen, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
It is under debate whether attention during smooth pursuit is centered right on the pursuit target or allocated preferentially ahead of it. Attentional deployment was previously probed using a secondary task, which might have altered attention allocation and led to inconsistent findings. We measured frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) to measure attention allocation in the absence of any secondary probing task. The observers pursued a moving dot while stimuli flickering at different frequencies were presented at various locations ahead or behind the pursuit target. We observed a significant increase in EEG power at the flicker frequency of the stimulus in front of the pursuit target, compared to the frequency of the stimulus behind. When testing many different locations, we found that the enhancement was detectable up to about 1.5° ahead during pursuit, but vanished by 3.5°. In a control condition using attentional cueing during fixation, we did observe an enhanced EEG response to stimuli at this eccentricity, indicating that the focus of attention during pursuit is narrower than allowed for by the resolution of the attentional system. In a third experiment, we ruled out the possibility that the SSVEP enhancement was a byproduct of the catch-up saccades occurring during pursuit. Overall, we showed that attention is on average allocated ahead of the pursuit target during smooth pursuit. EEG frequency tagging seems to be a powerful technique that allows for the investigation of attention/perception implicitly when an overt task would be confounding.
在平稳跟踪过程中,注意力是正好集中在跟踪目标上还是优先分配到目标前方,这一点仍存在争议。此前,人们使用次要任务来探究注意力的分配情况,而这可能改变了注意力的分配并导致结果不一致。我们测量了频率标记的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),以在没有任何次要探测任务的情况下测量注意力分配。观察者跟踪一个移动的点,同时在跟踪目标前方或后方的不同位置呈现以不同频率闪烁的刺激。与目标后方刺激的频率相比,我们观察到目标前方刺激的闪烁频率处脑电图功率显著增加。在测试许多不同位置时,我们发现跟踪过程中在目标前方约1.5°范围内都能检测到增强,但在3.5°时消失。在固定注视期间使用注意力提示的对照条件下,我们确实观察到在这个偏心度下对刺激的脑电图反应增强,这表明跟踪过程中注意力的焦点比注意力系统分辨率所允许的更窄。在第三个实验中,我们排除了SSVEP增强是跟踪过程中发生的追赶性扫视的副产品的可能性。总体而言,我们表明在平稳跟踪过程中,注意力平均分配在跟踪目标前方。脑电图频率标记似乎是一种强大的技术,当显性任务会产生混淆时,它可以用于隐式地研究注意力/感知。