Toffanin Paolo, de Jong Ritske, Johnson Addie, Martens Sander
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jun;72(3):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.006.
Frequency tagging is an EEG method based on the quantification of the steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) elicited from stimuli which flicker with a distinctive frequency. Because the amplitude of the SSVEP is modulated by attention such that attended stimuli elicit higher SSVEP amplitudes than do ignored stimuli, the method has been used to investigate the neural mechanisms of spatial attention. However, up to now it has not been shown whether the amplitude of the SSVEP is sensitive to gradations of attention and there has been debate about whether attention effects on the SSVEP are dependent on the tagging frequency used. We thus compared attention effects on SSVEP across three attention conditions-focused, divided, and ignored-with six different tagging frequencies. Participants performed a visual detection task (respond to the digit 5 embedded in a stream of characters). Two stimulus streams, one to the left and one to the right of fixation, were displayed simultaneously, each with a background grey square whose hue was sine-modulated with one of the six tagging frequencies. At the beginning of each trial a cue indicated whether targets on the left, right, or both sides should be responded to. Accuracy was higher in the focused- than in the divided-attention condition. SSVEP amplitudes were greatest in the focused-attention condition, intermediate in the divided-attention condition, and smallest in the ignored-attention condition. The effect of attention on SSVEP amplitude did not depend on the tagging frequency used. Frequency tagging appears to be a flexible technique for studying attention.
频率标记是一种基于对由以特定频率闪烁的刺激所诱发的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)进行量化的脑电图方法。由于SSVEP的幅度受注意力调制,使得被关注的刺激比被忽略的刺激诱发更高的SSVEP幅度,该方法已被用于研究空间注意力的神经机制。然而,到目前为止,尚未表明SSVEP的幅度是否对注意力的梯度敏感,并且关于注意力对SSVEP的影响是否取决于所使用的标记频率一直存在争议。因此,我们比较了在三种注意力条件(集中、分散和忽略)下,使用六种不同标记频率时注意力对SSVEP的影响。参与者执行视觉检测任务(对嵌入字符流中的数字5做出反应)。同时显示两个刺激流,一个在注视点左侧,一个在注视点右侧,每个刺激流都有一个背景灰色方块,其色调以六种标记频率之一进行正弦调制。在每次试验开始时,一个提示表明应该对左侧、右侧还是两侧的目标做出反应。集中注意力条件下的准确率高于分散注意力条件。SSVEP幅度在集中注意力条件下最大,在分散注意力条件下居中,在忽略注意力条件下最小。注意力对SSVEP幅度的影响不取决于所使用的标记频率。频率标记似乎是一种研究注意力的灵活技术。