School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB107QG, United Kingdom.
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Evaluate the effectiveness of workplace interventions to improve sitting posture of workers that spend long periods of time seated at a visual display terminal.
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and single-group intervention trials featuring workplace interventions with pre- and follow-up measurements of sitting posture was conducted (registered in PROSPERO, CRD#42015027648). Nine databases were searched for studies available between January 2005 and February 2016.
2519 articles were screened with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The included studies featured various ergonomic workplace interventions and comprised 4 randomised controlled trial (n=457), 2 non-randomised controlled trials (n=416) and 6 single-group intervention trials (n=328). Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, pooling of data was not completed and a narrative summary of findings was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The evidence for four review outcomes was assessed with medium to large positive improvements obtained for the majority of studies investigating changes to gross sitting posture, whereas mixed findings were obtained for more specific local segment assessments of sitting posture. The overall evidence quality for all review outcomes were identified as either 'low' or 'very low'.
There is evidence which is limited in quality to indicate that ergonomic workplace interventions can improve gross sitting posture. More high quality research across a range of intervention types is required with longer follow-up durations and more advanced methods to assess sitting posture with greater frequency and less bias.
评估改善在视觉显示终端前长时间坐姿的工作人员坐姿的工作场所干预措施的效果。
对随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和具有坐姿前后测量的单组干预试验进行系统评价(在 PROSPERO 中注册,CRD#42015027648)。对 2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 2 月期间可用的研究进行了 9 个数据库的检索。
共筛选出 2519 篇文章,其中 12 项研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究采用了各种人体工程学工作场所干预措施,包括 4 项随机对照试验(n=457)、2 项非随机对照试验(n=416)和 6 项单组干预试验(n=328)。由于临床和方法学的异质性,未完成数据的汇总,并使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)框架对研究结果进行了叙述性总结。对四项综述结果的证据进行评估,发现大多数研究都观察到总体坐姿有明显改善,而对于更具体的坐姿局部分段评估则得出混合结果。所有综述结果的证据质量均被认为是“低”或“极低”。
有质量有限的证据表明,人体工程学工作场所干预措施可以改善总体坐姿。需要在更多干预类型的研究中进行更高质量的研究,以获得更长的随访时间和更先进的坐姿评估方法,从而提高评估的频率并降低偏倚。