Gross Douglas P, Park Joanne, Rayani Fahreen, Norris Colleen M, Esmail Shaniff
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Workers' Compensation Board Alberta Millard Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2355-2363. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
To examine whether motivational interviewing (MI) leads to more sustainable return-to-work outcomes for injured workers undergoing rehabilitation.
Cluster randomized controlled trial.
Workers' compensation rehabilitation facility.
Claimants (N=728) undergoing rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions, who were predominantly employed (529, 72.7%) men (460, 63.2%) with chronic conditions (mean duration, 234d).
MI is a goal-oriented, client-centered counseling approach that facilitates behavioral change through identifying and resolving ambivalence. Treating clinicians at the facility were randomized into 2 groups. One group included 6 clinicians who were trained to conduct MI interventions during rehabilitation, while the control group included 6 clinicians who continued standard procedures.
Outcomes included compensation outcomes over 1 year after discharge. This included reception of disability benefits and recurrence rates. Analysis was stratified by admission employment status and included chi-square test, t test, and multivariable regression.
Participants included 728 claimants, of whom 367 (50.4%) were treated with MI. Unemployed claimants in the MI group received significantly more partial temporary disability benefits (mean, 8.2d vs 0.2d; P=.02), indicating return to modified work duties. Employed claimants in the control group had a higher recurrence rate (9.1% vs 4.5%; P=.04). The adjusted odds ratio for benefit recurrence was 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.5) after controlling for age, sex, and number of previous claims.
Use of MI appears to lead to more sustainable return to work after rehabilitation and facilitates transition to modified work duties.
探讨动机性访谈(MI)是否能为接受康复治疗的受伤工人带来更可持续的重返工作岗位的结果。
整群随机对照试验。
工伤康复机构。
因肌肉骨骼疾病接受康复治疗的索赔者(N = 728),主要为受雇人员(529人,72.7%),男性(460人,63.2%),患有慢性病(平均病程234天)。
动机性访谈是一种以目标为导向、以客户为中心的咨询方法,通过识别和解决矛盾心理来促进行为改变。该机构的治疗临床医生被随机分为两组。一组包括6名接受过在康复期间进行动机性访谈干预培训的临床医生,而对照组包括6名继续采用标准程序的临床医生。
结果包括出院后1年内的赔偿结果。这包括领取残疾福利和复发率。分析按入院时的就业状况进行分层,包括卡方检验、t检验和多变量回归。
参与者包括728名索赔者,其中367人(50.4%)接受了动机性访谈治疗。动机性访谈组中的失业索赔者领取的部分临时残疾福利明显更多(平均8.2天对0.2天;P = 0.02),表明已恢复到修改后的工作职责。对照组中的受雇索赔者复发率更高(9.1%对4.5%;P = 0.04)。在控制了年龄、性别和既往索赔次数后,福利复发的调整比值比为2.7(95%置信区间,1.1 - 6.5)。
动机性访谈的使用似乎能使康复后更可持续地重返工作岗位,并有助于向修改后的工作职责过渡。